Skip to main content

Activating biophilic design patterns as a sustainable landscape approach

Abstract

Biophilic design elements are found around us in many landscape elements while we do not perceive them as biophilic design patterns. By developing our understanding of biophilic design as a phenomenon, we could discover simple ways to utilize landscape elements and transform them into a good biophilic design that might have positive impacts on a user’s health and well-being. Activating existing biophilic elements as an approach to a sustainable landscape has not been studied yet. Therefore, we rather analyse some international case studies in order to understand how biophilic design patterns can be implemented and see their different forms. Later, we will also go through an Egyptian biophilic design pattern case study and implement it to reach a sustainable landscape model. To summarize, the purpose of this study is to present a new sustainable landscape approach by activating biophilic design patterns in order to increase landscape efficiency.

Introduction

A “love of life or living systems” is biophilia (Aristotle). It is our intrinsic human connection to the natural world. This simple relationship may often seem comprehensive but unfortunately has been lost through the urban world of technology and industrial architecture. In order to get a natural environment for us to live, function, and learn, we should consider biophilic design for this matter. We are unconsciously reconnecting by integrating nature into interior or architectural design, integrating the great nature into our environment. An environment without nature can badly impact health, efficiency, and well-being.

Biophilic design can incorporate nature into our environment and designs places of inspiration and regeneration that bind humans with their environment. Although it is hard to find a space that can accommodate all biophilic design elements, many contributory elements can enhance the space and well-being. It is more than just adding a plant or two to the space! [10]. A positive effect can be generated by filtered sunlight, planting, green walls, water features, natural textures and materials, and views of nature. If simply looking at nature can inspire you, imagine how living in an environment integrated with elements from nature can do? As a result, an important question comes up “Could we use the biophilic design patterns to increase the landscape efficiency?” And if so, how could it be implemented in existing landscapes to set up a sustainable approach in the Egyptian cases.

It is imperative to apply the concept of biophilic design not only in new designs but also within existing landscape sites. To our knowledge, no study has introduced biophilic design patterns as an approach to increase the efficiency of an existing site and create a sustainable landscape. Therefore, we will explore what is biophilia and biophilic design on a broad scale, then narrowing them into different biophilic design patterns with different landscape design forms. Then, we will study different international case studies and analyse all forms of biophilic patterns. Then, finally, we will repeat the same scenario but to an Egyptian case study, to examine the presence of biophilic patterns and suggest modifications in the proposed design, so we can come out with an efficient, integrated, and sustainable approach using biophilic design.

Methods

In this study, the concept of biophilic design was further investigated and studied, concerning its positive contribution to health and well-being. Based on profound theoretical and analytical studies, the principles of biophilic landscape design patterns were concluded. Furthermore, the efficiency of the concluded patterns was tested in a practical case study in the Egyptian urban context.

Sustainable landscape, biophilia, and biophilic design

Themes from nature had been always seen in early human structures, such as cave paintings and statues, which shows that biophilic design is not a new phenomenon. In 1865, the landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted argued that nature scenery influences the human mind over the body and refreshes the whole system. Later, in the nineteenth century, there was a campaign to create large public parks in order to help in stress reduction and improve health [10].

The beginning of the term “Biophilia” was in 1964 by the social psychologist Eric Fromm who defined it as “Biophilia is the passionate love of life and of all that is alive” [22]. Later, in 1984, the biologist Edward Wilson contributed in making the term Biophilia more common [28].

A conference was conducted in 2004 to discuss translating the biophilia into the built environment design; a book was then released sequentially (Eds., [1]). The book discussed the ways of creating a biophilic experience and summed up the user experience into three main categories: nature in the space, natural analogues, and nature of the space.

The recent decade has shown an increase in the research and practice of biophilic design that it has been included in the green building standards. Some of the most popular texts that have been published on this topic are mentioned hereinafter: Last Child in the Woods [23], Healing Spaces [24], The Shape of Green [25], Your Brain on Nature [26], The Economics of Biophilia [27], and, 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design [10].

Biophilia definitions

Biophilia as a concept promoted the idea that connection with nature plays an essential role in physical and mental health, and this has been proven in many studies [1629] In modern society, it also plays a significant role in social and family relationships [30]. It is also useful in highly dense urban areas office workers [31] and helps in stress reduction for university students and staff [32]. Furthermore, a study proved the inherent psychological and physiological link between humans and nature and evaluated the research supporting the social, environmental, and economic benefits of biophilia [33].

The term biophilia was defined as “The inherent human inclination to affiliate with nature that even in the modern world continues to be critical to people’s physical and mental health and well-being [343536, 37].

Terrapin also defined the term biophilia as “Humankind’s innate biological connection with nature” [10]. He also added: “It helps explain why crackling fires and crashing waves captivate us; why a garden view can enhance our creativity; why shadows and heights instil fascination and fear; and why animal companionship and strolling through a park have restorative, healing effects.” [10].

Biophilia was lastly defined as “The innate, genetically determined affiliation of human beings to nature and other living organisms.” (Biophilic Design Guidebook, June 2018).

Elements, principles, and experience of biophilic design

Biophilic design dimensions were first introduced in the book ‘Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life’ [1]. According to the book, there are two basic dimensions of biophilic design; the first dimension is the organic or naturalistic dimension, which represents the shapes and forms. The becond basic dimension is the place-based or vernacular dimension, which represents the buildings and landscapes connected to the culture and ecology of the local environment [21].

These two basic dimensions of biophilic design were then related to six biophilic design elements. Environmental features, natural shapes and forms, natural patterns and processes, light and space, place-based relationships, and evolved human-nature relationships are the main biophilic design elements [1]. Table 1shows the different attributes of each element.

Table 1 Six main biophilic design elements and their attributes

Later, in 2015, the principles of biophilic design were introduced in the book ‘The Practice of Biophilic Design’ [38]. These principles were repeated engagement with nature, focusing on human adaptations to the natural world, encouraging emotional attachment to specific places, promoting positive interactions between people and nature, and encouraging interconnected and incorporated architecture solutions. Also, the experience of nature was grouped into three types: direct experience of nature, indirect experience of nature, and the experience of space and place [38].

Categories and patterns of biophilic design

Biophilic design could be summed up into 3 main categories; each category encompasses some patterns. The main categories are as follows: nature in the space, natural analogues, and nature of the space [10].

The first category Nature in the Space includes all the direct, physical, and ephemeral existence of nature in a place. The influence of the nature in the space experience can be achieved through three main factors which are diversity, movement, and multi-sensory interactions, for instance Some flowerbeds and bird feeders; this category consists of seven biophilic design patterns and they are visual connection with nature, non- visual connection with nature, non-rhythmic sensory stimuli, thermal & airflow variability, presence of water, dynamic & diffuse light, and connection with natural systems [10]

The second category Natural Analogues includes indirect and non-living nature evocation. A strong result can be gotten if we can have accurate information, common examples are wooden furniture and granite table tops, they are real if they only represent analogous of the natural state of the objects. This category consists of three patterns of biophilic design and they are biomorphic forms & patterns, material connection with nature, and complexity & order [10].

The last category Nature of the Space includes all spatial aspects which can be found in nature and it expresses our desire to see things above and beyond our instant surroundings, and explore the unknown in a safe manner. A strong experience is achieved by: deliberate and engaging spatial arrangements, combined with patterns from the two other categories: Nature in the Space and Natural Analogues. This category consists of four biophilic design patterns, they are prospect, refuge, mystery, and risk/peril [10].

Since Wilson published The Biophilia Hypothesis almost two decades ago; the biophilia term has expanded considerably and the final biophilic patterns were analysed to disclose emotional connections mentioned by Wilson.

The term “pattern” is not only related to the natural environment through psychophysiological and cognitive relationships, but it can be an independent description for three main reasons: set up clear and standardized terminology, avoid confusion, and maximize accessibility across other disciplines. Table 2 gives a brief explanation of each biophilic pattern [10].

Table 2 Brief of the 14 biophilic patterns

Biophilic design application

Good biophilic design is usually drawn based on the user’s influential perspectives which can be impacted by health conditions, sociocultural norms, past experiences, and frequency and duration of experience are some of the most common examples [10].

Understanding the project’s design intent is one of the vital steps for a designer; the user’s performance needs must be precisely set up to identify the design strategies and interventions; to apply this scenario, two approaches can be used: first is to ask: What is the most biophilic space we could possibly design? Another query is to ask: How can biophilic design boost efficiency indicators that are already used by the client? [10]. Reducing stress and improving overall mood is one of the many biological responses that may occur to the design, besides other unlimited combinations of design interventions and patterns. A biophilic design’s impact on health represents great importance to managers, planners, and policy makers [10].

There is no appropriate duration when it comes to the time of exposure to a pattern; ideal duration depends upon the user and the required effect; it has been verified that health benefits could occur in a time of 5 to 20 min [3940, 41]. When a little duration of exposure is required, a pattern is usually located along paths with high foot traffic; this helps in improving access frequency [10].

Biophilic design impact on health

Evidence of the impact of biophilia on health was shown mainly in three mind-body systems: cognitive, psychological, and physiological systems; the impact on these systems was tested and explored in various ways to understand how the environment could impact a user’s health and well-being [10]. The results showed how each pattern can affect three main categories: stress reduction, cognitive performance, and emotion, mood, and preference. All patterns had an impact on at least one category but most of them impacted two to three categories.

Framework of biophilic design patterns

Biophilic design patterns have been defined to guide and assist in the design process and the main purpose was to explain the connection between the characteristics of built and natural environments [10]. Table 3 shows the summary of each pattern’s experience, objective, design attributes, and examples.

Table 3 Biophilic patterns framework

Biophilic design patterns are very flexible and could be implemented in design using various shapes based on user-specific needs; the combination of patterns tends to increase the positive impact on health and also integrating design strategies could lead to a restorative environment for users from different cultures and demographics [10].

Case studies

When it comes to studying the different biophilic patterns in a landscape and their efficiency, we need to choose spaces that are accessible to the public and created for different types of users. In that order, we can understand if all different users receive the same experience or not.

Case 1 (Greenacre Park)

Greenacre Park is a small park that is located between tall towers in Manhattan; it consists of three different levels offering users various environmental conditions; the excellent implementation of the biophilic design patterns creates a quiet and peaceful space, which is rare in the city centre.

The site plan is divided into three different spaces using plants, water, and trellises (Fig. 1). A T-shaped flower bed acts as a physical divider, the water bordering the lower level and a steel trellis demarcating the raised platform. This section highlights the elevation change between the street and space levels (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Site plan. Source: www.terrapinbrightgreen.com

Case 2 (Paley Park)

Paley Park was the first of its kind when initially opened back in 1967; it was created right after designing the concept of very small accessible parks that are open to the general public; today, it is one of the most common parks in New York City (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Section. Source: www.terrapinbrightgreen.com

The way this park was designed makes it a unique space for office workers and Museum of Modern Art patrons during short breaks.

This site plan shows the honey locust trees arranged loosely to assure the casualness of the space (Fig. 3). A tall waterfall acts as a focal point and dominates the space. Also, the movable site furniture allows flexible seating throughout the space, which creates a dynamic series of layouts (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Site plan. Source: www.terrapinbrightgreen.com

Fig. 4
figure 4

Section. Source: www.terrapinbrightgreen.com

Biophilic design patterns implemented in case studies

Table 4 shows biophilic design patterns in the case studies.

Table 4 Biophilic design patterns in the case studies

Applied case study

As mentioned in the previous section, existing landscape spaces need to be accessible to the public and visited by different types of users; our case study is a commercial administrational complex that is sought by various user types; the space offers a pleasurable pedestrian experience and also a great haven during short breaks for different types of employees in the complex.

Rivulet is a fully integrated complex that is located in El Sheikh Zayed City on the main 26th of July corridor combining different categories of attractions like restaurants, cafes, shops, and gyms and also has a business hub and medical centres; the space’s unique and simple design makes it a harbour for visitors and workers during short breaks (Figs. 5, 6, 7, and 8).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Green wall. Source: Researcher

Fig. 6
figure 6

Reflecting pool. Source: Researcher

Fig. 7
figure 7

Water fountain. Source: Researcher

Fig. 8
figure 8

Site Plan. Source: Researcher

The plan shows the green wall and water fountain that is located beside the entrance; the palm trees are arranged with fixed spaces between them; besides the reflecting pool that acts as a focal point in the space, some seat steps are provided by the water features.

The section cut through the centre of the plan showing the reflecting pool area with its deck, railings, and palm trees. It also shows the green wall (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Section. Source: Researcher

In order to evaluate this case study, we need to verify which patterns were achieved, and in which form and more over how we could increase its efficiency. Table 5 shows the patterns represented in the case study, with a brief on the form that was used to represent each pattern.

Table 5 Biophilic design patterns found in the applied case study

Results and discussion

The unrepresented patterns in the case study, lead to the absence of some important integrations of biophilic design patterns. This lowers the positive impact of design on health and reduces the effect of biophilic design overall. Table 6 shows the missing and achieved integrations between patterns in the previous case study.

Table 6 Achievement of integrated biophilic design patterns in the case study

The missing patterns could be implemented easily in order to achieve the integration between different patterns and increase the positive impact of the design. Referring to the case study, the missing patterns are dynamic and diffuse light and biomorphic forms and patterns.

Dynamic and diffuse light is an important pattern in order to elicit feelings of drama and mystery, time, and movement, buffered with a feeling of peace; the main goal of this pattern is to achieve an ununiformed distribution of light, but without extreme differences. This pattern could be achieved in many ways; some examples are creating shade structures, providing more shade using trees, or using simulated light distribution at night.

The aim of biomorphic forms and patterns is to use biomorphic styles and patterns in a way that creates a more visually desired atmosphere that enhances cognitive performance while helping to alleviate tension. We are more attracted to organic and biomorphic shapes, but there is a hidden scientific reason that we need to figure out and address. While biomorphic forms and patterns are not living objects, our brain recognizes that they can be represented as symbolic representations of life; this pattern could be implemented in two ways, the decor elements and the form. Some examples in decor include golden mean in fabrics, carpets and wallpaper design, window glass colour and texture, and free-standing sculptures. While in form, examples include building and furniture form, columns shaped like trees, and pathway form.

Conclusions

As explored throughout the paper, biophilic design patterns can increase the efficiency of a landscape site experience; the more varieties of the patterns are used, the more efficiency we get. This takes us back to our main research question: “Could we use the biophilic design patterns to increase the landscape efficiency?”

The research aimed to introduce a new sustainable landscape approach by activating biophilic design patterns, to increase landscape efficiency; this approach was applied to an Egyptian case study, to analyse the possibilities and results and furthermore to suggest a proposed design that activates the biophilic landscape efficiency and achieves pattern integration.

All in all, biophilic design patterns are found around us in the landscape elements of any space, even if not intended or implemented in purpose. With little modifications, some landscape designs could be transformed into an integrated sustainable biophilic design that could generate positive impacts on the users and increase the landscape efficiency. Activating our perception of biophilic design patterns could be easily achieved by increasing the types of patterns and their different forms. This would also impact the user’s health and well-being.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials will be available upon request.

References

  1. Kellert, S. R. (2008). Dimensions, Elements, and Attributes of Biophilic Design. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, December 2015, 3–19

  2. Peters T, D’Penna K (2020) Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: a critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064

  3. Mazuch R (2017) Salutogenic and biophilic design as therapeutic approaches to sustainable architecture. Architectural Design 87(2):42–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan CO, Browning WD (2018) Biophilic design. In: Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1034-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Amat RC, Ismail S, Wahab MH, Ahmad NH, Rani WNMWM (2020) A dimension of biophilia in urban design. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 409(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/409/1/012016

  6. A biophilic landscape design in Shanghai, China By Kyle Saylor Hopkins B. S ., The Ohio State University, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirements f or the de. (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duzenli T, Tarakci Eren E, Akyol D (2017) Concept of sustainability and biophilic design in landscape architecture. J Acad Soc Sci 5(June):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beatley T (2017a) Handbook of biophilic city planning and design. Handbook of biophilic city planning and design, pp 1–289. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-621-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Challenge LB (2018) Biophilic design guidebook, International Living Future Institute, pp 1–26 https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/18-0605_Biophilic-Design-Guidebook.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  10. Browning W, Ryan C, Clancy J (2014) 14 Patterns of biophilic design, Terrapin Bright Green, LLC, pp 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wijesooriya N, Brambilla A (2020) Bridging biophilic design and environmentally sustainable design: a critical review. J Cleaner Production 283:124591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oliver, H., Victoria, J., & Eden, G. (2018). Creating positive spaces using biophilic design. https://globalwellnessinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/biophilicdesignguide-en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hidalgo AK (2014) Biophilic design, restorative environments and well-being, 9th International Conference on Design and Emotion 2014: The Colors of Care, pp 535–544

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beatley T, Newman P (2013) Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability (Switzerland) 5(8):3328–3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beatley T (2017b) Biophilic cities and healthy societies. Urban Plann 2(4):1–4. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i4.1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reeve AC, Desha C, Hargreaves D, Hargroves K (2015) Biophilic urbanism: contributions to holistic urban greening for urban renewal. Smart Sustain Built Environ 4(2):215–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-11-2014-0057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The Human-nature connection : biophilic design in a mixed-use, multi-unit residential development by Natalie Rogers Foidart A practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements o. (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Correlating patterns in the urban landscape : biophilia and landscape configuration By Kimberly Dietzel Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Environmental Design — Master of the Arts. (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kellert, S. R., & Finnegan, B. (2011). BIOPHILIC DESIGN The architecture of life viewing guide. http://www.biophilicdesign.net/

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tahoun ZNA (2019) Awareness assessment of biophilic design principles application. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci 329(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/329/1/012044

  21. Akande QO, Aduwo EB (2019) Assessment of biophilic design patterns on skill development, in Minna, Niger State. J Physics 1378(4):042078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/4/042078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Erich, F. (1964). The heart of man. Harper & Row

  23. Louv, R. (2008).  Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder, Algonquin Books. New York

  24. Sternberg, E. (2009). Healing spaces: The Science of Place and Well-Being. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

  25. Hosey, L. (2012). The Shape of Green: Aesthetics, Ecology, and Design. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp 216

  26. Selhub, E. M., & Logan, A. C. (2012). Your brain on nature; The science of nature's influence on your health, happiness, and vitality. Toronto: Harper Collins Publishers Ltd

  27. Browning, W. D., Ryan, C., Kallianpurkar, N., Laburto, L., Watson, S., Knop, T. (2012). The Economics of Biophilia, Why Designing with Nature in Mind Makes Financial Sense. New York: Terrapin Bright Green

  28. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

  29. Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond Toxicity: Human Health and the Natural Environment.  Am J Prev Med Volume 20(3):34–240

  30. Chang P. J., Bae, S. (2017). Positive emotional effects of leisure in green spaces in alleviating workefamily spillover in working mothers. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 14:757

  31. Xue, F. , S. S. Y. Lau, Yifan Song & Zhonghua Gou, B. Jiang, (2016). Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing

  32. Lau, S.S.Y., Gou, Z., Liu, Y., (2014). Healthy camps by open space design: approach and guideline. Front Archit Res 3:452–467

  33. Soderlund, J., Newman, P. (2015). Biophilic architecture: a review of the rationale and outcomes. AIMS Environ Sci. 2(4):950–969

  34. Wilson, E. O. (1986). Biophilia: the Human Bond with Other Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

  35. Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press

  36. Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Island Press

  37. Kellert, S. (2012). Birthright: People and Nature in the Modern World. New Haven: Yale University Press

  38. Kellert, S. R. C., Elizabeth F. (2015). The Practice of Biophilic Design. Retrieved from www.biophilicdesign.com

  39. Brown, D. K., Barton, J. L., Gladwell, V. F. (2013). Viewing nature scenes positively affects recovery of autonomic function following acute-mentalstress. Environ Sci Technol, 47:5562–9

  40. Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol

  41. Tsunetsugu, Y. & Y. Miyazaki (2005). Measurement of Absolute Hemoglobin Concentrations of Prefrontal Region by Near-Infrared Time-ResolvedSpectroscopy: Examples of Experiments and Prospects. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 24(4)

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my very great appreciation for the valuable assistance given by Dr. Hesham Mohamed El-Barmelgy. I also wish to acknowledge the help provided by Eng. Shorouk Ahmed Taha.

Funding

This study had no funding from any resource.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Ass. Prof. Sahar Ismail Mohamed Abdel hady

Cairo University, Faculty of Regional and Urban Planning, Department of Urban Design

Educational Background:

  1. 1.

    Certificate of A Consultant Engineer, Engineering Branch (Architecture), the Field of (Urban Design), 1/10/2018.

  2. 2.

    Assistant Professor, Faculty of Regional and Urban Planning, Department of Urban Design, 2018.

  3. 3.

    PHD. Landscape Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt, 2011.

  4. 4.

    M.sc, Urban Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt, 2003.

  5. 5.

    B.sc, Urban/Region Planning, Cairo University, Egypt, 1989.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar Ismail Mohamed Abdel Hady.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hady, S.I.M.A. Activating biophilic design patterns as a sustainable landscape approach. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 68, 46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00031-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00031-x

Keywords

  • Biophilic design
  • Sustainable landscape
  • Biophilic design patterns
  • Biophilic design elements
  • Landscape efficiency