Skip to main content

Influence of the polyester non-wovens production type on their thermal and flammability properties


In recent years, non-wovens have become the main segment of textile production because they can find applications in different areas. Thermal insulation properties, fire resistance, and flexibility make them cost-effective and efficient insulation panels for buildings. This paper aims to study the influence of the production method and surface treatment on the thermophysical characteristics and behavior under direct fire of two polyethylene terephthalate non-woven fabrics. The fibers have been bonded with polyacrylate adhesive or thermal and coated with silicone. Infrared spectroscopy, optical microscopy, and thermal analyses were applied to compare the non-wovens’ morphology, composition, and thermal properties. It founds that the non-woven polyester with acrylic additives and adhesive bonding has a higher thermal conductivity value and high flammability with complete combustion. In contrast, thermosetting siliconized polyester materials have limited flammability with limited droplet release. The silicone-based finish protects the polyester fibers leading to self-extinguishing and stopping the complete combustion of the sample.


Thermal insulation is a substantial element in ensuring energy efficiency in building construction. Polymers have been of great interest for this purpose due to their excellent properties, such as waterproof, anti-corrosion, wear resistance, anti-seismic, lightweight, good strength, sound, heat, and electrical insulation [1]. Polystyrene (PS), polyurethane (PU), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in the foam form are already found the wide application as thermal insulation materials in the building industry [2]. Despite their exceptional characteristics, some problems are the reason for continuing research on perfect thermal insulation. The studies have focused on improving their brittle and fracture resistance, recycling the polymer waste, use of renewable raw materials [3]. The other requirements are a uniform pore structure, mechanical strength, climate ageing durability, microbial resistance, the ability to regulate the thermal insulation level, resistance towards water, and freezing/thawing cycles. Other properties are fire resistance without smoke and toxic gases during burning. The materials must be able to be cut and adapted on the construction site and be cost-effective [4].

Textile insulation products from virgin or recycled materials have many advantages and comparable properties with other insulation materials [5]. In many applications, the non-wovens are preferred to the conventional woven and knitted fabrics due to their properties and easy making, combining high productivity with lower cost. Non-woven production technology allows easy recycling of fiber waste [6]. A cheap resource used as textile waste has an environmental and economic effect [7].

Recovery of industry-generated waste has been an extremely pressing issue in recent years because waste has a serious impact on the ecological balance of the Earth [7]. The protection of the environment, as well as the new circular economy development tendencies, made it possible to examine various new ways to utilize waste—domestic, construction, or industrial—be it as a raw material for a new production, a heat source (RDF, SDF), or as a component in various building materials.

A promising area is the textile waste utilization from the light industry, listed in Directive 2008/98/EC on waste and repealing certain directives [8] and Commission Decision of 3 May 2000, and fully fitting into the “Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe”. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency [9], ordinarily only about 15% of all textile waste is recycled. These available free resources are suitable for the production of cheap insulation materials.

Polyester fibers are the most widely used non-wovens and have the potential to be 100% recyclable. Polyester (PET) is a thermoplastic synthetic polymer from which almost 52% of all textile fibers are produced [10,11,12,13]. However, only 13% of it is subject to subsequent recycling [13]. There are already many studies that present the merits of this material for the production of thermal insulation [6, 14,15,16,17,18].

The main application of PET is for light non-woven products in the form of wadding, auxiliary sewing materials, cushion stuffing, filters, medical patches, masks etc. [13] As a textile material, PET has several advantages - good mechanical properties, moisture resistance, resistance to temperature and light, as well as good chemical resistance to solutions of acids and bases at room temperature. The main disadvantage is its low hygroscopicity, due to which it is difficult to dye and is highly prone to static electricity [10, 19]. Polyester belongs to the so-called moderately flammable fibers that are more difficult to ignite. As the other synthetic polymers (e.g., acrylic, nylon), PET tends to melt and drip, sometimes self-extinguishing upon removal of the ignition source [20]. The flame retardant properties of PET non-woven fabrics can be improved by using relatively non-flammable fibers but also by application of additives in finishing [21, 22]. The coatings on the fibers can prevent flame propagation and improve resistance to irradiative heat flux exposure [23]. The presence of inorganic additives like silica derivates can form protective glassy layers that could insulate the inner layers from further decomposition. Silicones have been used successfully as a flame retardance addition, thanks to their high thermal stability, minimal sensitivity to external heat flux, low heat release rate, and low toxic gas generation during combustion [21, 24].

The current paper presents specific test results aiming to determine the basic thermophysical characteristics and behavior under direct fire of PET samples which are obtained by different production methods and are a waste product from the textile industry. The aim is to establish whether these non-wovens are suitable for and meet the requirements for being used as building thermal insulation materials.



The subject of the study is two non-woven fabrics obtained from polyester fibers with different coating and production technologies (adhesive or thermal bonding). Five probes cut into a square shape (side 25 cm) were tested from each non-woven. The fabrics’ properties are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Samples description


Morphological analysis of samples conducted by a light optical microscopy

The structure of the tested samples was defined using a Metam LV41 light microscope. Various techniques have been applied—dark field and polarized light, aiming a better fiber visualization.

FTIR analysis

For the characterization of the studied non-woven fabrics, mATR-FT-IR analysis was applied. The spectra were obtained from an infrared Fourier transform spectrometer (IRAffinity-1, Shimadzu), equipped with a diffuse-reflectance attachment (MIRacle Attenuated Total Reflectance Attachment). Measurements were done using a spectral range of 600–4000 cm−1. This allows for the application of instrumental non-invasive analysis to determine the non-wovens production method and decide on the further processing ensuring their new, enhanced properties.

Differential thermal and thermogravimetric analysis (DTA and TGA)

The simultaneous thermal analysis TGA was carried out with STA PT1600 TG-DTA/DSC analyzer (LINSEIS Messgeräte GmbH, Germany) at a heating rate of 10°C/min between room temperature and 600 °C under an air atmosphere.

Thermal properties measurement

The thermal properties of the samples were measured using the ISOMET 2114 instrument, which is based on the modified transient plane source (MTPS). The measurement accuracy is ± 5%. The averages of 10 measurements for each sample were taken, and the mean values of the thermal properties were calculated. The following parameters are defined: thermal conductivity (k), volumetric heat capacity (cp), and thermal diffusivity (𝛼) [25, 26].

Infrared camera visualization

The behavior of the tested materials under thermal impact is examined on a specially built experimental installation. All test specimens are subjected unilaterally to a heat flux generating a temperature of T = 60 °C. The heat source is located at a 30-cm distance from the test samples. The heat field is 12 × 15 cm.

The samples are photographed with a FLIR 60Ebx infrared camera to visualize the heat field distribution. Infrared images are taken after different periods of short-term exposure to heat—0 min, 3 min, and 5 min.

Flammability testing

A flammability test by the BDS EN ISO 6941: 2006 standard is performed. The method of the edge ignition is applied. A burner is placed perpendicularly, in the middle of the front side of the test specimens. The length of the flame is 40 mm and is fed by propane gas. The axis of the burner to the vertical plane of the lower sample end is at an angle of 30°. The distance between the end of the burner and the lower end of the sample is 20 mm. All the tested samples (dimensions 25 cm × 12.5 cm) are conditioned under a standard atmosphere at a temperature of 25 °C and relative humidity of 65%. The test is performed under standard conditions with fire duration of 5 s.

Results and discussion

Morphology of non-wovens

The test specimens were made from polyester fibers with a smooth surface and nearly circular cross-section (Fig. 1). The fibers in sample 1 have a shiny and transparent surface, and the fibers in sample 2 have a matte surface with good polarizing ability. Both samples of test materials have a high degree of transparency due to their low density.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structures of the non-wovens at different magnifications

Infrared analysis

Figure 2 shows the infrared spectra of the non-woven fabrics sample 1 and sample 2 in the range from 1800 cm−1 to 600 cm−1. The polyester fibers in the sample 2 have been thermally bonded and coated with silicone. The blue arrows in Fig. 2A) show the characteristic bands of polyester functional groups and values of their maxima. The stretching vibration of C=O in either group was characterized by a strong band of 1714 cm−1. The 1408 cm−1 band shows a vibration of the aromatic ring, and the 1340 cm−1 one of the C–H bonds. The stretching vibrations appear at 1242 cm−1 (C–O bond in –O–C=O), at 1095 cm−1 (indicates the presence of C–O in O–CH2), at 1019 cm−1 due to C–O–C, and at 970 cm–1 (C–O bond). The C–C and C–H vibrations from the benzene ring in the polyester appear at 873 cm−1 and 723 cm−1. It is difficult to distinguish the main characteristic bands for the silicone coating because they coincide with the typical bands for polyester. In the Fig. 2A) two bands are pointed with red arrows. The presence of Si–(CH3)3 is confirmed by the absorption peaks at 1263 cm−1 and it appears in the spectrum as a shoulder of the peak with a maximum at 1242 cm–1. A low-intensity peak appears at 1044 cm−1 due to the Si–O–Si connection.

Fig. 2
figure 2

FT-IR spectra. A Sample 2. B Comparison of sample 1 and sample 2

In Fig. 2B, the infrared spectra of both samples are compared. In sample 1, the polyester fibers have been bonded by polyacrylate adhesive that is well visible in its IR spectrum. The band intensity of 1720 cm−1 is increased due to the presence of C=O groups. The bands with the intensity of 1449 cm−1, 1378 cm−1, and 847 cm−1 are assigned to the C–H bond, respectively from CH3, CH2–CO, and CH2 groups. The transmittance bands with the intensity of 1156 cm−1 are ascribed to C–O–C.

Thermal degradation behavior of non-wovens

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curves of both non-woven PET fabrics in air are shown in Fig. 3A, B, respectively. The fabrics’ thermal degradation has three stages. The first weight loss stage is at around 225–340 °C for sample 1 and around 225–380 °C for sample 2. This stage is associated with the process of moisture removal absorbed from the air. Therefore, the second main weight-loss percentage stage starts for sample 2 at a higher temperature than for sample 1 and ends at 450 °C for both samples. The weight loss for sample 1 is 78% and 74% for sample 2 because polyester fibers become thermal stable after their coating with silicone. During the third stage, for both fabrics, the weight decreases gradually. The remaining residues at 600 °C for sample 2 (11.27%) are higher than for sample 1 (9.60%). These results show better thermal stability of sample 2 because the silicone coating protects the polymer fibers.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Thermal degradation behavior for non-wovens. A TGA diagrams. B DTG diagrams

The DTG curves give detailed information about the ongoing processes. They allow pointing precisely the number of thermal degradation stages and the temperature of maximum degradation rate Tmax. The height of the DTG picks shows the rate of mass decomposition kinetics [27]. Figure 3B displays the Tmax of each degradation stage of non-wovens. For sample 2, two or even three processes can point in the region between 450 °C and 600 °C. For sample 1, the critical weight loss stage is more complex and probably combines several successive processes.

Figure 4 shows the differential thermal analysis (DTA) of sample 1 and sample 2. Fabric thermal decomposition in the air begins with an exothermic process that ends at 227 °C, followed by an endothermic process, represented by a narrow peak with a maximum of 255 °C for sample 2 and a broad peak for sample 1. These peaks in the DTA chart are related to the first step of weight loss in the TGA curve and may be associated with the dehydration process. Also, a small peak is observed in the DTG graph in this temperature range. Next, the chemical transformation continues as exothermic combustion reactions. Significant weight loss in TGA (Fig. 3A) and peaks in DTG curves (Fig. 3B) were observed at this temperature range, indicating the degradation of polyester fibers. After that, the exothermic process continues faster for sample 1 and ends at 448 °C. This temperature coincides with the end of the second stage in the TGA curve. Next, the endothermic peaks appear with a maximum of 470 °C and 480 °C accordingly for sample 1 and sample 2. Subsequently, the exothermic conversion of the materials continues with further heating.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Differential thermal analysis (DTA) of the sample 1 and sample 2 in air (heating rate of 15 °C/min)

Thermophysical study

Table 2 presents the results of the thermophysical study of the tested non-woven materials. Both samples have a very similar coefficient of thermal conductivity; therefore, they have similar thermal insulation properties. The results are analogous to those of other authors [27,28,29,30,31]. The non-woven fabrics’ thermal insulation properties are comparable to those of foamed polymer insulators such as polystyrene, polyurethane, polyvinyl chloride, and others [32]. The specific heat capacity for both materials is high. This makes them good thermal insulators. The heating of the material will be slow. Only a greater heat amount would lead to a temperature change. However, sample 1 has a lower heat capacity value. Therefore, they have less ability to accumulate heat and have a better thermal conductivity compared to sample 2. Sample 1 shows a more than 20% higher value of thermal diffusivity than sample 2. The non-woven fabric bonded by a polyacrylate dispersion has a higher temperature than the thermally bonded non-woven fabric with a silicone coating. This is crucial for their flammability as sample 1 would have better flammability compared to sample 2.

Table 2 Thermal properties of the non-woven fabrics

The infrared imaging of the studied materials (Fig. 5) shows a very similar thermal behavior and an identical heat field distribution. Despite their different heat storage capacity, during the short-term heat exposure, the studied materials reach very similar maximum temperatures in the range of 75–82 °C for sample 1, and the range of 78–82 °C for sample 2. The registered temperature difference between the two surfaces in the sample 1 is averagely ΔT = 10 °C, and in the sample 2–averagely ΔT = 8 °C.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Infrared images of the studied samples

The uneven distribution of the thermal field proves the stochastic and uneven distribution of the fibers, and therefore their uneven density in the studied objects, which is a result of the production technology. The local density of the samples directly affects their thermal behavior.

The conducted burning test proves that the polyester fibers processing in non-woven fabric production has an enormously strong influence on their flammability. The results are presented in Figs. 6 and 7.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Burning time (in seconds) of the samples after flame removing

Fig. 7
figure 7

Remainders of the tested materials after the flammability test

Series 1 samples are ignited at the time of the fire application and develop intense combustion lasting up to 10 s after its removal. The combustion is also accompanied by an intensive melting, smoke emission, and formation of many liquid burning drops. The samples have a specific yellow flame and burn completely within 25–30 s of the test start.

Series 2 samples are ignited at the time of the fire application but have limited combustion. The duration of the residual combustion is about 12 s. The silicone coating of the fibers leads to a sparse separation of individual liquid burning droplets. Combustion is also accompanied by intense melting and smoke. The sample is partially burned with a 50% loss of the test area. Charring of the burnt edges is registered. The sample burns slowly with a yellow flame.


The studied polyester non-wovens have distinguished thermal insulation properties (k ≈ 0.04 W/m.K) comparable to the other materials (polystyrene foam, polyvinyl chloride foam, and polyurethane foam) traditionally used in construction thermal insulation. They have the same weight and thickness with a modest difference in their density and different method of production, which, however, affects their thermophysical characteristics.

The non-woven polyester with acrylic additives and adhesive bonding has a higher thermal conductivity value and high flammability with complete combustion. In contrast, thermosetting siliconized polyester materials have limited flammability with limited droplet release.

Polyester fibers with silicone coating have better thermal stability than polyester fibers without it, which has been established and proven by carried out tests.

The research continues with the siliconized thermally bonded polyester non-woven fabrics and their suitability as a thermal insulation material in construction.

Availability of data and materials

All experiments and results were conducted at the university laboratories in Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar” and the University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Bulgaria. The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.





Modified transient plane source


Refuse-derived fuel


Solid recovered fuel

FT-IR spectrum:

Fourier transform infrared spectrum


  1. Shen J, Liang J, Lin X, Lin H, Yu J, Yang Z (2020) Recent progress in polymer-based building materials. Int J Polymer Sci 2020.

  2. Xu X, Jiang Q (2019) Brief analysis on application of PVC foam materials in building material industry. MSF 944:729–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jin F, Zhao M, Park M, Park S (2019) Recent trends of foaming in polymer processing: a review. Polymers 11:953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jelle B, Gustavsen A, Baetens R (2010) The High Performance Thermal Building Insulation Materials and Solutions of Tomorrow. Buildings XI Conference: Proceedings of the Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XI International Conference (Buildings XI), Clearwater Beach, Florida, USA

  5. Jordeva S, Longurova S, Kertakova M, Mojsov K, Efremov J (2019) Textile as a sustainable insulating material for buildings. Tekstilna Ind 2:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Danihelová A, Nemec M, Gergel T, Gejdoš M, Gordanová J, Scensný P (2019) Usage of recycled technical textiles as thermal insulation and an acoustic absorber. Sustainability 11(10):2968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Intini F, Kühtz S (2011) Recycling in buildings: an LCA case study of a thermal insulation panel made of polyester fiber, recycled from post-consumer PET bottles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Accessed 31 May 2022

  9. Textiles: Material-Specific Data. Facts and Figures about Materials, Waste and Recycling. Accessed 31 May 2022

  10. Boyon J (2014) Effect of silicone finishes on the burning behavior of polyester. Dissertation, Graduate School of Clemson University.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Polyester fiber production globally 1975-2020. Accessed 4 Mar 2022.

  12. Chemical fibers global production 2000-2020. Accessed 4 Mar 2022.

  13. Opperskalski S, Siew S, Tan E, Truscott L (2019) Preferred Fiber & Materials Market Report 2019. Accessed 4 Mar 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paiva A, Varum H, Caldeira F, Sá A, Nascimento D, Teixeira N (2011) Textile subwaste as a thermal insulation building material. In: 2011 International Conference on Petroleum and Sustainable Development IPCBEE, vol 26, pp 78–82

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zach J, Novak V, Peterková J (2018) Study of the behaviour of thermal insulation materials made with recycled textile fibers. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 385:012065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Massoudinejad M, Amanidaz N, Santos RM, Bakhshoodeh R (2019) Use of municipal, agricultural, industrial, construction and demolition waste in thermal and sound building insulation materials: a review article. J Environ Health Sci Eng 17(2):1227–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jordeva S, Tomovska E, Trajković D, Zafirova K (2014) Textile waste as a thermal insulation material. Tekstil 63:174–178

    Google Scholar 

  18. Patnaikab A, Mvubua M, Muniyasamyab S, Bothaa A, Anandjiwala R (2015) Thermal and sound insulation materials from waste wool and recycled polyester fibers and their biodegradation studies. Energ Buildings 92:161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chinta S, Singh R (2012) processing problems of polyester and its remedies. Inte J Eng Res Technol 1:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaan S, Salimova V, Rupper R (2011) A Ritter and H Schmid. Functional textiles for improved performance, protection and health. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, Cambridge

  21. Hamdani S, Longuet C, Perrin D, Lopez-cuesta JM, Ganachaud F (2009) Flame retardancy of silicone based materials. Polym Degrad Stab 94:465–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Genovese A, Shanks RA (2008) Fire performance of poly (dimethyl siloxane) composites evaluated by cone calorimetry. Compos Part A 39:398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malucelli G (2020) Sol-gel and layer-by-layer coatings for flame-retardant cotton fabrics: recent advances. Coatings.

  24. Wang W, Zammarano M, Shields J, Knowlton E, Kim I, Gales J, Hoehler M, Li J (2018) A novel application of silicone-based flame-retardant adhesive in plywood. Mater Des.

  25. Shi J, Liu Y, Liu B, Han D (2019) Temperature effect on the thermal conductivity of expanded polystyrene foamed concrete: experimental investigation and model correction. Adv Mater Sci Eng.

  26. Kadirova S, Kolev Z (2020) Determination of the heat convection coefficient by CFD simulation of heat transfer processes at forced convection. In: 7th International Conference on Energy Efficiency and Agricultural Engineering (EE&AE).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Tilioua A, Libessart L, Joulin A, Lassue S, Monod B, Jeandel G (2012) Determination of physical properties of fibrous thermal insulation. EPJ Web Conf 33:02009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. James J (2020) Polymers and multicomponent polymeric systems: thermal, thermo-mechanical and dielectric analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

  29. Oğlakcioğlu N, Marmarali A (2007) Thermal comfort properties of some knitted structures. FIBRES & TEXTILES Eastern Europe January 15:64–65

    Google Scholar 

  30. Abdel-Rehim ZS, Saad MM, El-Shakankery M, Hanafy I (2006) Textile fabrics as thermal insulators. AUTEX Res J 6:148–161

    Google Scholar 

  31. Steven Keller D, Branca DL, Kwon O (2012) Characterization of non-woven structures by spatial partitioning of local thickness and mass density. J Mater Sci 47:208–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang H (ed) (2011) Building Materials in Civil Engineering. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, Cambridge

  33. COMMISSION DECISION of 3 May 2000 replacing Decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Council Decision 94/904/EC establishing a list of hazardous waste pursuant to Article 1(4) of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste (notified under document number C(2000) 1147). Accessed 31 May 2022

  34. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. Accessed 31 May 2022

  35. Neznakomova МP, Klotz M-L, Gospodinova DN (2019) Non-woven composites intensification properties for air filters by plasma pre-treatment. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 659:012044, IOP Publishing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Neznakomova M, Boteva S, Tzankov L, Elhag M (2018) Non-woven textile materials from waste fibers for cleanup of waters polluted with petroleum and oil products. Earth Syst Environ 2:413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


No funding was used to conduct the research. There are no sources of funding to be declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RPS and PZ study conception and design. RPS, PZ, and DS C contributed to the data collection analysis and interpretation of the results. RPS, PZ, and DS contributed to the draft manuscript preparation and review. The authors read and approved the final paper.

Authors’ information

  • Assoc. Prof. Rositsa Petkova-Slipets—PhD, Engineer in Materials Science, a researcher with long years of experience in the field of studying the structure and properties of materials. Works at Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar”, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Civil Engineering.

  • Assoc. Prof. Penka Zlateva—PhD, Engineer in Thermal Engineering, a researcher with long years of experience in the field of heat and mass transfers, thermodynamics, and combustion. Works at the Technical University of Varna, Faculty of Shipbuilding, Department of Thermal Engineering.

  • Assoc. Prof. Desislava Staneva—PhD, Chemical Engineer, a researcher with long years’ experience in the field of composite materials, cotton, recycling, and textiles. Works at University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Faculty of Chemical Technologies, Department of Textile and Leather.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rositsa Petkova-Slipets.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petkova-Slipets, R., Zlateva, P. & Staneva, D. Influence of the polyester non-wovens production type on their thermal and flammability properties. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 69, 51 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: