Skip to main content

Motorized hospital bed for mobility of patients: a review on wheel type design

Abstract

Mobile bed to move patients in hospitals is a critical aspect in a healthcare system. Typical hospital beds often require significant manpower and impose physical stresses on caregivers. This paper explores potential solutions to improve hospital bed mobility, focusing on the integration of robotic technologies. Existing literatures on the subject are reviewed, including studies on hospital bed design structures, ergonomic considerations, and implementations of robotics. Different types of wheels suitable for robot movements are discussed, covering conventional wheels, omniwheels, mecanum wheels, swerve drives, and powered fifth wheels. Each wheel type is described and its advantages and disadvantages are highlighted. The comparison of these wheel types helps identify the most suitable option for modifying hospital beds while maintaining their maneuverability. Furthermore, the paper draws inspiration from many applications of mobile robots in other industries, such as automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), to explore potential innovations for the healthcare. By leveraging robotic technologies, hospitals can enhance efficiency and alleviate the burden on healthcare workers.

Introduction

Hospital beds have always played a critical role in the healthcare system, serving as devices for patient treatment and transportation [1]. Unfortunately, this task can be inefficient, time-consuming, and require a significant amount of manpower to complete. The main reason for this is the heavy weight and large dimensions of the hospital bed, in addition to the weight of the patient and other attached equipment [2]. Typically, it takes between two to four operators to safely move a hospital bed [3].

Moreover, studies have shown that manual patient handling tasks, particularly during patient transfers, impose significant physical stress on caregivers [4], and are strongly linked to low back disorders and pain [5,6,7,8]. Recognizing these risks, it is crucial for hospitals to invest in technologies and procedures to reduce the burden on healthcare workers and enhance patient treatments.

The idea of reducing the effort required to operate hospital beds has been a subject of interest for some time. It is important to note that research efforts to enhance the features of hospital beds have been ongoing since the 1990s [9]. However, most of these efforts have primarily focused on design structures and ergonomic aspects aimed at improving user comfort for both patients and caregivers.

Kerstin Petzall et al. [10] conducted an experiment to investigate how different wheel arrangements on hospital beds impacted user effort. By testing four types of arrangements in two tasks—propelling in a straight corridor and maneuvering in a small space—they found that no single wheel arrangement met the requirements for both conditions. This suggests that simply improving the structure of the bed is insufficient to reduce effort. A more logical approach would involve adding a new assisting mechanism or introducing robotics to eliminate the need for operators. While there have been numerous studies on improving hospital bed mobility, robotics approaches have shown promise. A study by Zhao Guo et al. [11] demonstrated that implementing robotics in hospital beds could decrease the muscle load on operators. Currently, there are commercial products in development in this area, such as the addition of a motorized fifth wheel to the typical four-wheel hospital bed by Electrodrive [12] and Hospimek [13] and motorized bed movers created by various companies, which will be discussed further in the following section of this paper [14,15,16,17].

The objective of this paper is to review potential solutions for addressing hospital bed mobility issues. The focus is on examining and analyzing previous studies and existing solutions in this area. Various modifications are explored to identify the most suitable wheel type system that can be integrated into hospital bed design. The methodology of this paper involves surveying existing types of robotic wheels and their current applications in healthcare and other fields.

Mobile robot principal for hospital bed

Mobile robots are autonomous or semi-autonomous robots that are designed to move through various environments. These robots can be used for a wide range of applications, from household chores to industrial tasks. The working principle of mobile robots involves the use of sensors, control systems, and actuators to navigate and interact with their environment. These robots typically use a combination of sensors such as light radar (LIDAR), cameras, and ultrasonic sensors to perceive their surroundings [18]. The information gathered from these sensors is then processed by the robot’s control system to make decisions about how to move and interact with the environment. Movement systems such as wheels, tracks, or legs are used to propel the robot and manipulate objects in its environment [19]. The control system coordinates the movements of these actuators based on the information gathered from the sensors, allowing the robot to move autonomously. In the context of hospital bed motorization, mobile robots can be utilized to assist in moving patients from one location to another within the hospital. These robots can be designed through complex hospital corridors, avoiding obstacles and ensuring the secure and efficient transportation of patients to their intended destinations.

Types of wheels

This section provides an overview of the different types of wheels commonly used for robot movement based on their characteristics and applications. The selection of the wheel type is crucial as it directly affects the mobile robot's ability to navigate and maneuver in its environment. This section aims to help readers understand the benefits and limitations of each wheel type, and make informed decisions when selecting the appropriate wheel type for a hospital bed mobility system.

Typical hospital beds use caster wheels, so the wheel types discussed here must have similar characteristics to caster wheels. Two factors are emphasized: first, the hospital bed wheel must prioritize patient comfort by imitating the smooth-rolling circular wheels, and second, the wheel must maintain the ability to move in all directions like caster wheels. The wheel types considered in this paper are conventional wheels, omniwheels, and Mecanum wheels. Non-wheeled movement systems, such as tracked wheels and walker mechanisms, are not included because they may not necessarily be beneficial for hospital bed applications.

Conventional wheel

Conventional wheels are commonly used in driving systems, whether in mobile robots or other types of vehicles. They can be arranged in configurations of two to four wheels, as depicted in Fig. 1 below. In a four-wheel configuration, the wheels are positioned in a square or rectangular arrangement. The wheels are fixed, meaning they can only rotate around their main shaft axes. Steering is achieved by rotating the wheels on opposite sides at different angular speeds or in opposite directions, while on the same side they are driven in synchronization [20]. This type of steering also allows for zero turning radius, enabling on-the-spot turning at the center of the vehicle body [21].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Four and two wheel robots [22, 23]

Conventional wheels offer several advantages. They provide simplicity in design and control, as there is no need for a separate steering mechanism. The robot can achieve a small turning radius, making it suitable for maneuvering in tight spaces. Additionally, the system offers good traction and stability, allowing the robot to effectively handle uneven terrain or obstacles. However, one limitation of the four-wheel skid-steering system is that it can cause excessive wear on the wheels and may not be suitable for delicate surfaces [24]. The wheels can experience scrubbing and skidding friction forces when the robot changes direction, potentially leading to faster wear and reduced lifespan of the wheels. Therefore, two-wheel drive robots are more commonly used with this type of wheels. A variety of applications can be easily found in robotics competitions, education, research, and industrial automation. Some examples of two-wheel drive robots include line-following robots, warehouse carriers, and vacuum cleaners [25].

Mecanum wheel

The Mecanum wheel is a type of omni-directional wheel that was first developed by Bengt Erland Ilon in 1972 [26]. The wheel consists of a base connected to the driving motor and a set of rollers, as shown in Fig. 2. The rollers are attached at a specific angle (typically a 45° angle). The Mecanum wheel has three degree of freedom, including steering drive, roller motion, and vertical axis turning slip at the point of interaction. Unlike other omnidirectional wheel, the Mecanum wheel is more efficient in driving forward and backward because the wheel is positioned at a straight angle, acting like a normal wheel [27].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mecanum wheel [28]

The Mecanum wheel has been utilized in a variety of industries, such as education, military, industry, and aeronautics. It is known for its ability to provide omnidirectional movement in different applications. However, its effectiveness may be hindered by the type of surface it is used on. The wheel performs best on flat surfaces, but may struggle to maintain traction and mobility on uneven surfaces. In such cases, the rollers may lose grip, leading to a reduction in the wheel's tractive effort [29, 30].

Omniwheel

The omniwheel, also known as a universal wheel, is a type of wheel that allows a vehicle to move in any direction. Similar to the Mecanum wheel, the omniwheel consists of a main frame and a set of rollers placed perpendicular to the frame, as shown in Fig. 3. Omniwheels are typically used in three- to four-wheel configurations where the wheels are positioned at an angle or perpendicular to the side of the robot body. The direction of the wheel is determined by the rotational speed and the combined vector of each omniwheel [31]. Omniwheels come in various designs, using either short cylindrical rollers or long curved rollers similar to the Mecanum wheel, and often consist of two or more layers of sets of rollers. These layers compensate for the empty contact surface area left uncovered by a single layer of rollers. Since the roller axes are perpendicular to the wheel axis, omniwheels on a vehicle are typically arranged at an angle to each other in order to function properly [32].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Omniwheel [33]

Comparison of wheel types

This section compares different types of wheels discussed in the previous section, along with their respective advantages and disadvantages. The goal is to determine the most appropriate wheel type for the hospital bed that needs modification. Specifically, the modified wheel type should retain the previously mentioned mobility, focusing on agility in the confined spaces of healthcare facilities. Furthermore, the introduction of a powered wheel type is anticipated to decrease the effort needed to move the hospital bed, while also ensuring easy maneuverability to adapt to the dynamic and constantly changing healthcare setting. Table 1 provides a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of each wheel type.

Table 1 Comparison of wheel types

Table 3 provides technical details regarding various types of wheels that can be valuable for designing a mobile robot model [27, 36]. Each wheel type is characterized by a minimum diameter and maximum load capacity. This parameters are the most common parameter of wheel available in the market, but it may vary among different manufacturer and various applications [37].

Based on the Tables 1 and 2, each wheel type possesses its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Conventional wheels are highly reliable and durable but lack the ability to move freely in all directions, while omniwheels and Mecanum wheel are an excellent choice for enhancing a robot’s maneuverability. The overall performance of the movement system of a mobile robot is influenced not only by the type of wheel chosen, but also by the configuration of the wheel.

Table 2 Technical parameter of wheel types

Types of drivetrains

This section provides an overview of the different types of drivetrains commonly used for mobile robots and is related to the various wheel types. In robotics, a drivetrain refers to all the components and mechanisms configured in a way that enables a robot to move. The simplest type of drivetrain is a wheel directly powered by a motor. The types of drivetrains include car drive, skid-steer, holonomic drive, Mecanum drive, H-drive, and swerve drive.

Car drive

In the field of robotics and autonomous systems, the concept of car drive refers to a method of locomotion that emulates the movement principles of conventional automobiles. This drive mechanism is popular due to its simplicity and versatility. It uses conventional wheels, typically powered by motors, to generate motion in a manner like a car runs on the roads. The key characteristic of the car drive is that the wheels are aligned parallel to each other, resulting in forward or backward movement [38, 39]. Steering is achieved by turning a wheel or a set of wheels, placed in the front or back of the robot as illustrated in Fig. 4. This type of drive system is highly effective for applications that require reliable, stable movement over various surfaces [40]. It is commonly utilized in situations where precise turns and controlled straight-line motion are essential, such as warehouse logistics, material handlings, and even basic robotic platforms. The simplicity of the car drive system makes it a popular choice from beginner-level robotics projects to sophisticated industrial applications [41].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Conventional steering [42]

Skid-steer

The skid-steer drive mechanism is a distinctive approach to robotic locomotion that capitalizes on differential motion and wheel slippage to achieve precise movement. It is characterized by the use of wheels on either side of the vehicle that are independently driven at the same speed, allowing forward or backward straight motion, or at different speeds, allowing radius turning as well as turning (rotating) on the spot, as demonstrated in Fig. 5. One key characteristic of the wheel system in the skid-steer drive is that the wheels do not have a steering mechanism like traditional steering wheels found in common cars. Instead, they rely on differential speeds to change the direction of the robot. When one side vehicle wheels are driven faster than the others, the robot undergoes a controlled skidding motion, resulting in a change of direction [43]. By driving the wheels on one side at a different speed or in the opposite direction compared to the other side, the robot can turn or pivot effectively. To turn the robot while moving forward, the wheels on one side are driven faster than the wheels on the other side, causing a difference in rotational speed and resulting in a turning motion. By adjusting the speed and direction of each wheel independently, the robot can execute complex maneuvers, such as rotating in place or following curved paths. Figure 5 below shows the movement mechanism of skid-steer drive.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Skid-steer drive

Skid-steer is particularly advantageous in situations where tight maneuverability is required, such as in construction equipment, agricultural machinery, and various types of robotic exploration vehicles. The ability to pivot on the spot makes it ideal for navigating through constrained spaces and executing intricate maneuvers. However, it does require careful control and coordination of the wheel speeds to prevent excessive wear and tear on the wheels and drivetrain components [44].

Holonomic drive

The concept of a holonomic drive introduces a paradigm shift in robotic locomotion by enabling a robot to achieve omnidirectional movement without the need for complex steering mechanisms. In a holonomic drive, omniwheels are used and positioned in a specific configuration, often in a triangular or square arrangement, such as shown in Fig. 6. In a three omniwheel configuration, each wheel is typically positioned at 120° angles with respect to the others, evenly spaced around the center of the robot's chassis. In a four omniwheel configuration, each wheel is typically positioned at 90° angles, also evenly spaced around the center [45]. Each wheel is independently powered and can move in any direction, including forward, backward, and sideways, without the needs to alter the wheel’s orientation [46].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Omniwheel type and movement schematic

This unique ability to move instantaneously in any direction is achieved through a combination of the precise motor control and the strategic arrangement of the wheels. Holonomic drive system is invaluable in many applications that demand high degrees of agilities, such as indoor navigations, mobile robotics, and even advanced automation processes. By allowing robots to move effortlessly in any direction, holonomic drives enhance efficiency and versatility in various tasks, reducing the need for constantly repositioning and turning the vehicle [47,48,49]. Figure 6 also illustrates the rotations of vehicle wheels and the resulting direction in four- and three-wheel configurations.

Mecanum drive

A Mecanum drive is a drivetrain that employs a set of uniquely designed wheels, ordinarily using four Mecanum wheels. These wheels feature rollers positioned at an angle to the wheel’s rotation axis, enabling them to generate both forward and lateral forces [50]. By carefully controlling the rotation of each individual motorized wheel, a Mecanum drive-equipped robot can achieve complex movements, including translations and rotations in any direction [51]. This drive system’s distinct capability to move diagonally and pivot smoothly makes it highly suitable for applications where precise maneuvering and positioning are crucial, such as robotic arms, automated guided vehicles (AGVs), and even entertainment robots [52]. However, the complexity of the wheel design and the intricacies of the control algorithms required for accurate motion make the Mecanum drive systems more challenging to implement compared to the traditional drive mechanisms. The movement diagram of the Mecanum drive is shown in Fig. 7 below.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Movement schematic of the Mecanum wheel

H-drive

The H-drive is a hybrid drivetrain that merges the principles of both omnidirectional and skid-steer mechanisms. The configuration consists of central, powered wheels perpendicular to the direction of the main drive wheels, forming an “H” shape. An example of the H-drive is shown in Fig. 8, with two wheels located at the middle and the four main drive wheels are placed at the corners of the H shape. They can be independently controlled for forward, backward, and sideways movements. The central wheels can be lowered or raised, enabling the robot to pivot for on-the-spot turning [53]. This unique design allows the H-drive to combine the advantages of skid-steer maneuverability with the benefits of omnidirectional movement. H-drive systems are especially useful in scenarios where the robot needs to navigate through confined spaces while maintaining stable and controlled motion. However, since more moving parts are needed, this makes the build more complicated. Furthermore, the H-drive requires precise coordination of the central and peripheral wheels, making the advanced control algorithms of the wheels becomes a critical aspect for the mobility. This drivetrain finds applications in fields such as warehouse automations, robotics competitions, and even assistive devices for individuals with mobility challenges [54].

Fig. 8
figure 8

H-drive configuration using omniwheel [55]

Swerve drive

Swerve drive is a unique type of drivetrain that enables individual wheels to be both driven and steered independently of each other. This configuration requires two motors—one to rotate the wheel and the other to rotate the steering system. Since each wheel can be powered and controlled independently, hence vehicle which use swerve drive could be driven in omnidirectional, the swerve drive also classified into the holonomic drive system, providing a level of precision and maneuverability that is difficult to achieve with other drive systems. By enabling each wheel to move in any direction and rotate on its own axis, swerve drive systems are particularly well-suited for tasks that require omnidirectional movement, such as robotics competitions, industrial automations, and mobile robotics [56]. Figure 9 below is an example of swerve drive module used for robotics applications.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Swerve drive module [57]

Comparison of the drivetrain

Table 3 below provides a comprehensive comparison of different drivetrain types, highlighting their respective advantages and disadvantages.

Table 3 Comparison of the drivetrains

Inspiration from different applications

This section presents the ways in which mobile robots are being used in various fields, and how these applications could inspire innovation in the healthcare industry. While mobile robots have already proven to be effective in fields such as logistics, manufacturing, and agriculture, their potential to revolutionize healthcare is just beginning to be realized. By examining the successes and challenges of using mobile robots in other industries, we can identify potential areas for improvement and innovation in healthcare, especially in improving the capability of the hospital bed.

Automated guided vehicle

In automation industries, many types of robots had been adopted. One of the types of the robot is automated guided vehicle (AGV). AGV is a type of material handling robot or load carrier that operates without the need for an onboard human operator or driver. The robot is mainly designed to travel automatically with guidance positioned along the path throughout warehouses, distribution centers, or manufacturing facility/assembly lines, performing tasks such as transporting goods and materials from one location to another. It effectively performs tasks that would typically be handled by forklifts, conveyor systems or manual carts, moving large volumes of material in repetitive manners [59].

Autonomous mobile robot

An autonomous mobile robot (AMR) is a type of robot that can navigate and perform tasks in a variety of environments without the need for human intervention. AMRs are equipped with various sensors, such as cameras, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), and ultrasonic sensors, which enable them to perceive their surroundings and avoid obstacles. AMRs are designed to operate in a range of settings, including warehouses, factories, hospitals, and even outdoor environments. They can perform a variety of tasks, such as transporting goods, picking and placing objects, and inspecting facilities [60].

One of the key features of AMRs is the ability to operate autonomously. This means that they can plan their own paths, make decisions, and adapt to changing conditions without human input [61]. They are also able to communicate with other robots and systems to coordinate their actions and share information.

AMRs are increasingly being used in industrial and commercial settings to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance safety. By automating repetitive or dangerous tasks, they can free up human workers to focus on more complex and creative work. Additionally, they can work around the clock, without the need for breaks or rest periods, further increasing productivity. The difference between AMR and AGV is mainly in its automation system. For example, when there is an object blocks its guide path, AGV could detect the objects in front of it, then stop and wait until the obstacle removed from its path. AMR is able to not only detect the object but capable to plan and take alternative route to avoid the obstacle [62].

AMRs are being increasingly used in healthcare to improve patient care, increase efficiency, and reduce costs. The followings are some of the ways AMRs are being used in the healthcare [63]:

  • Deliveries of medications and supplies: AMRs are used to deliver medications, medical supplies, and equipment throughout hospitals and clinics as shown in Fig. 10 [64]. This reduces the time and effort needed for manual delivery, freeing up healthcare workers to focus on patient care.

  • Sterilization: AMRs equipped with ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light technology are used to disinfect patient rooms, operating rooms, and other high-touch areas in the healthcare facilities. This reduces the spread of infections and enhances safety for patients and healthcare workers.

  • Inventory management: AMRs are used to track inventory levels and automatically reorder supplies when needed. This reduces waste and ensures that healthcare facilities have the necessary supplies on hand to provide quality patient care.

  • Waste management: AMRs are used to collect and transport medical waste, reducing the need for human involvement in this potentially hazardous task.

Fig. 10
figure 10

AGV in healthcare [64]

Motorized wheelchair

Swerve drive A motorized wheelchair, also known as an electric wheelchair, is a type of mobile device powered by an electric motor. It is designed to help people who have difficulties to walk or unable to walk due to disabilities, injury, or illness. Motorized wheelchairs have a seat, footrests, and a set of wheels. Typical motorized wheelchairs are controlled by a joystick or other type of control mechanism, as shown in Fig. 11a. Some models have rechargeable batteries that store the electric energy to power the motor, allowing the user to travel short distances on their own. Other types of wheelchairs must be plugged in to an electrical outlet for supplying the energy [65].

Fig. 11
figure 11

a Typical motorized wheelchair [66], and b motorized wheelchair with LiDAR sensor for autonomous mobility [67]

In addition to the traditional motorized wheelchairs, there are now also autonomous wheelchairs that are equipped with advanced technology to navigate and move independently without human intervention. These wheelchairs are designed for individuals with disabilities or limited mobility who desire greater independence and freedom of movement.

Compared to the traditional motorized wheelchairs, autonomous wheelchairs are more advanced in terms of their technologies and features. They are typically equipped with a range of sensors, including cameras, LiDARs, and ultrasonic sensors, that allow them to detect obstacles and other objects in the environment. Figure 11b shows an example of autonomous motorized wheelchair developed by Baltazar et al. [67] equipped with LiDAR sensor. This advanced sensing technologies enable the wheelchair to navigate complex indoor and outdoor environments with ease, providing the user with a greater degree of independence and mobility.

Autonomous wheelchairs also typically use mapping and localization algorithms to understand their environment and plan their movements accordingly. This allows the wheelchair to navigate around obstacles and find the most efficient path to a given destination. Additionally, some autonomous wheelchairs are also capable of avoiding collisions and adapting to changes in their environment in real-time.

Existing technologies of active mobile hospital bed

This section describes several solutions that have been implemented to improve the hospital bed mobilities.

Robotic hospital bed

Swerve drive Wang et al. [68] have designed and built a prototype of an automated hospital bed that has a focus on navigation, mapping, and obstacle avoidance. The wheel type system used in this prototype, however, is relatively basic, as it only has two differential wheels that restrict its maneuverability to a nonholonomic type. The hospital environment is typically a dynamic setting with many people and objects moving around, making it unrealistic to expect hospital beds to have the capability for omnidirectional mobility, which is a key feature of a holonomic wheel type. The current wheel type used in the prototype developed by Wang et al. [60] lacks the ability to perform 360° turns and may not be able to navigate around obstacles with ease. This highlights the need for further advancements in the wheel type technology used in automated hospital beds to improve their mobility and functionality in the hospital environment [69]. Figure 12a shows the prototype of the automated hospital bed.

Fig. 12
figure 12

a Automated hospital bed by Wang et al. [68], and b motorized hospital bed using the swerve drive by Dhelika et al. [9]

In the pursuit of cost reduction in the development of motorized hospital beds, Dhelika et al. [9] undertook an innovative approach of constructing a prototype. Their methodology involved the adaptation of a conventional passive hospital bed wheel system, wherein they integrated a four-module active swerve drive system to enhance the bed mobility, as presented in Fig. 12b. The majorities of the components comprising each module were fabricated via 3D printing technology, utilizing polylactic acid (PLA) plastic as the primary material. The active power for these modules was harnessed from a pair of direct current (DC) motors, facilitating in both forward and lateral wheel movements. Furthermore, the system’s maneuverability was conveniently orchestrated through the employment of a Wireless Joystick interface.

To improve the previous work, Girindra et al. [70] conducted an evaluation of assembly time of motorized wheel module for hospital bed using Boothroyd-Dewhurst method, enabling the identification of opportunities for optimization. In a strategic move to bolster the module’s longevity, material substitutions were judiciously made. The team opted for aluminium and stainless steel as alternative materials for selected components, thereby elevating the overall structural robustness and resilience of the system.

Fifth wheel modification

As the name suggests, the fifth wheel is a wheel type system which adds an extra active powered wheel into a typical passive four-wheel system. Typically, an electric motor rotates the fifth wheel. The idea is basically to convert a manual bed into a motorized one, hence reduce the amount of work needed to push the bed. Because of its design, it does not have the ability to steer by itself; hence, the operator needs to steer manually. The advantages of using the fifth wheel include its feature to be attached to the bed frame avoiding major modification which reduces the required resources and time.

Shown in Fig. 13 is an example of the fifth wheel application to the hospital bed product developed by Hospimek [13]. The wheel is placed right in the center of the hospital bed and controlled using controller placed in the position where the handler could reach easily.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Hospital bed equipped with the fifth wheel [13]

Bed mover

The bed mover is a device to move hospital beds. Rather than redesigning new hospital beds and discarding the old ones, the bed mover preserves the existing passive hospital beds and can be used to move many. The principle of the bed mover is similar to a towing tractor used in factories or warehouses. The bed mover has its own active power. Therefore, when it is attached to the hospital bed, the operator could move the bed easily. Current hospital bed movers come with various types and design, but most of it come with two powered wheel design such as shown in Fig. 14a.

Fig. 14
figure 14

a Typical bed mover [13] and b ZED Bed mover [71]

The other variation of the bed mover, for example a concept developed by ZED [71], is displayed in Fig. 14b. Similar to the forklift principle where the bed mover lifts the bed and transports it. This mover is equipped with the swerve drive which can do omnidirectional movement. It also comes with a remote control for easy operation.

Comparison of mobile hospital bed technologies

Table 4 below presents a comparison of the aforementioned technologies of mobile hospital bed. It provides a brief description of each technology along with their respective advantages and disadvantages.

Table 4 Comparison of mobile hospital bed technologies

Conclusions

Conclusion

The mobility of hospital beds is a critical aspect in healthcare systems, as it affects patient care and the well-being of healthcare workers. Manual handling of hospital beds can be inefficient, time-consuming, and physically demanding, leading to potential risks and injuries for caregivers. Therefore, it is essential to explore solutions that can improve the mobility of hospital beds and alleviate the burden on healthcare workers. While previous research has primarily focused on the design structure and ergonomic aspects of hospital beds, it is evident that improving the structure alone is not enough to reduce the effort required for their movement. The introduction of robotics and automated systems shows promises in addressing this challenge. Studies have demonstrated that implementing robotics in hospital beds can reduce the physical strain on operators.

One key focus area is the selection of the appropriate wheel type system for the hospital bed mobility. This review paper discussed various wheel types, including steering wheels, two-wheel drive systems, omniwheels, Mecanum wheels, and swerve drives. Each configuration has its own advantages and limitations, and their suitability for hospital bed mobility depends on factors such as maneuverability, traction, control complexity, and cost.

Drawing inspiration from other fields, such as the use of automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) in logistics and healthcare, offers valuable insights. These applications have demonstrated the effectiveness of automation in improving efficiency, reducing costs, and enhancing safety. Implementing similar concepts in hospital bed mobility, such as automated deliveries of medications and supplies, sterilization capabilities, inventory management, and waste management, can greatly benefit the healthcare industry.

In summary, addressing the mobility challenges of the hospital beds requires a multidimensional approach. It involves considering not only the design structure and ergonomics but also exploring robotics and automation solutions. The selection of an appropriate wheel type system is crucial, considering the specific requirements of hospital bed mobility. By leveraging the successes and lessons learned from other industries, the healthcare sector can innovate and enhance patient care while alleviating the physical burden on healthcare workers.

Future development

The advancements in technology and infrastructure for hospital bed mobility are expected to bring significant improvements. These developments may include the use of advanced robotic systems with sensors, such as path follower, odometry, infrared, and LiDAR, could significantly improve mobility by providing more accurate environment perception for autonomous hospital bed or navigational aids for individuals with visual impairments.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms could be utilized to improve bed movement, ensure safety, and provide better and efficient path planning for patient mobility. This may involve refining the human–machine interface to allow for more intuitive control and feedback mechanisms. Additionally, integrating remote monitoring and reporting capabilities could enhance overall patient care.

Integration with hospital infrastructure, such as electronic health records and smart hospital systems, can optimize bed allocation and tracking. Additionally, Internet of Things connectivity will enable real-time monitoring of patient vital signs and bed status, facilitating remote monitoring and proactive care.

Future developments may also focus on human–robot collaboration by combining the strengths of robots with the judgment of healthcare workers. It is likely that safety features like intelligent braking systems and collision avoidance mechanisms will be prioritized in these advancements. Considerations for energy efficiency, sustainability, user feedback, iterative design processes will also contribute toward shaping future developments in hospital bed mobility.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AGV:

Automated guided vehicle

AMR:

Autonomous mobile robot

LiDAR:

Light radar

PLA:

Polylactic acid

DC:

Direct current

References

  1. Petzäll K, Berglund B, Lundberg C (2001) The staff’s satisfaction with the hospital bed. J Nurs Manag 9(1):51–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2834.2001.00189.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kube E (1980) HoČj-och saČnkbara saČngar inom laEngtidsvaErden (Long-term care beds adjustable with regard to height). Report 6026. Swedish Institute for Health Services Development, Stockholm (In Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo Z, Yu H (2016) Development of a novel robotic omni-directional hospital bed mover for patient transfer. 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) Shanghai, China, July 8-10, 2016. IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7736253

  4. Ando S et al (2000) Associations of self estimated workloads with musculoskeletal symptoms among hospital nurses. Occup Environ Med 57(3):211–216. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.57.3.211

  5. Yip YB (2001) A study of work stress, patient handling activities and the risk of low back pain among nurses in Hong Kong. J Adv Nurs 36(6):794–804. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2648.2001.02037.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engkvist IL (2008) Back injuries among nurses—a comparison of the accident processes after a 10-year follow-up. Saf Sci 46(2):291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2007.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marras WS, Davis KG, Kirking BC, Bertsche PK, M A Rr As WS and DAvis KG (2010) A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using diOE erent techniques https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185207

  8. Smedley J, Egger P, Cooper C, Coggon D, Smedley J (1995) Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses. Occup Environ Med 52:160–163. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.52.3.160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhelika R, Hadi AF, Yusuf PA (2021) Development of a motorized hospital bed with swerve drive modules for holonomic mobility. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 11(23):1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP112311356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. All KP, All JP (2003) Transportation with hospital beds. Appl Ergon 34:383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo Z, Xiao X, Yu H (2018) Design and evaluation of a motorized robotic bed mover with omnidirectional mobility for patient transportation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 22(6):1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2018.2849344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ‘Powered Fifth Wheel - Retrofittable Kit | Electrodrive’. Available: https://www.electrodrive.com.au/products/powered-fifth-wheel.aspx. Accessed: 23 Apr 2024

  13. ‘Motorized Patient Trolley’. Available: https://www.hospimek.com.sg/product-item/patient-trolley. Accessed: 27 Mar 2023

  14. ‘EVO Bed Mover - Materials handling’. Available: https://www.materialshandling.com.au/products/evo-bed-mover/. Accessed: 27 Mar 2023

  15. ‘Battery powered electric hospital bed mover and stretcher mover, GZS bed mover, Humphries bed mover’. Available: http://www.humphriescasters.com/electric-bed-movers/hospital_bed_mover-1. Accessed: 27 Mar 2023

  16. ‘M13TM Electric Bed Mover’. Available: https://absolutee-zup.com/product/m13-electric-bed-mover/. Accessed: 27 Mar 2023

  17. ‘Electric Bed Mover Zallys ML1 – emoveit’. Available: https://emoveit.com.au/product/zallys-ml1-electric-bed-mover. Accessed: 27 Mar 2023

  18. Zhu WK, Choi SH (2011) A closed-loop bid adjustment approach to dynamic task allocation of robots

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rubio F, Valero F and Llopis-Albert C (2019) A review of mobile robots: concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications. Int J Adv Robot Syst 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419839596. SAGE Publications Inc.

  20. Kozłowski K, Pazderski D (2004) Modeling and control of a 4-wheel skid-steering mobile robot. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 14(4):477–496

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasaki M et al (2023) Robust posture tracking control of stable coaxial two-wheeled AGV using the approximate inverse system and LMI. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro. https://doi.org/10.25077/jnte.v12n2.1106.2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ‘Makes everything simple: new drive system for AGVs, AMRs and Co. Available: https://www.drivesweb.com/drivesweb-newsletter-no-49/makes-everything-simple-new-drive-system-for-agvs-amrs-and-co. Accessed: 20 Oct 2023

  23. ‘File:Micromouse Green Giant V1.3.jpg - Wikimedia Commons. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Micromouse_Green_Giant_V1.3.jpg. Accessed: 20 Oct 2023

  24. Campion G and Chung W (2008) Wheeled Robots’, in Springer Handbook of Robotics, B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, Eds., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_18.

  25. Chan RPM, Stol KA, Halkyard CR (2013) Review of modelling and control of two-wheeled robots. Annu Rev Control 37(1):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ilon BE (1975) Wheels for a course stable selfpropelling vehicle movable in any desired direction on the ground or some other base. U.S. Patent No. 3,876,255. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3876255A/en

  27. Yadav PS, Agrawal V, Mohanta JC, Ahmed MDF (2022) A theoretical review of mobile robot locomotion based on Mecanum Wheels

    Google Scholar 

  28. ‘Right Mecanum Wheel - 48mm Diameter - TT Motor or Cross Ax… | Flickr. Available: https://www.flickr.com/photos/adafruit/50196120553. Accessed: 20 Oct2023

  29. Diegel O, Badve A, Bright G, Potgieter J, Tlale S (2002) Improved mecanum wheel design for omni-directional robots. In Proc. 2002 Australasian conference on robotics and automation, Auckland pp. 117-121

  30. ‘What are the advantages and disadvantages of mecanum wheels and omnidirectional wheels? - company news - news - Hangzhou RoboCT Technology Development Co.,Ltd.. Available: https://www.roboct-global.com/news/what-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-m-57011911.html. Accessed: 23 Apr 2024

  31. Asama H, Sato M, Bogoni L, Kaetsu H, Mitsumoto A and Endo I (1995) Development of an omni-directional mobile robot with 3 DOF decoupling drive mechanism. in Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation pp. 1925–1930 vol.2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1995.525546.

  32. ‘Robot Platform | Knowledge | Types of Robot Wheels. Available: http://www.robotplatform.com/knowledge/Classification_of_Robots/Types_of_robot_wheels.html’. Accessed: 31 Mar 2023

  33. ‘File:Side By Side P.png - Wikimedia Commons. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Side_By_Side_P.png. Accessed: Oct. 20, 2023

  34. Leong JSL, Teo KTK and Yoong HP (2022) Four wheeled mobile robots: a review’, in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET) pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IICAIET55139.2022.9936855

  35. Ramirez-Serrano A and Kuzyk R (2010) Modified mecanum wheels for traversing rough terrains’, 6th International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems, ICAS 2010, pp. 97–103 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAS.2010.35.

  36. Shabalina K, Sagitov A and Magid E (2018) Comparative analysis of mobile robot wheels design’, Proceedings - International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering, DeSE, vol. 2018-September, pp. 175–179 https://doi.org/10.1109/DESE.2018.00041.

  37. Nexus Robot, ‘Mecanum wheels (Ilon wheel). Available: https://www.generationrobots.com/media/Mecanum-wheel1-7.pdf’. Accessed: 23 Apr 2024

  38. Tang J, Li J and Liu Y (2014) Differential drive steering research on multi-axle in-wheel motor driving vehicle’, IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, ITEC Asia-Pacific 2014 - Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC-AP.2014.6941234.

  39. Prayudhi LH, Widyotriatmo A and Hong KS (2015) Wall following control algorithm for a car-like wheeled-mobile robot with differential-wheels drive’, ICCAS 2015 - 2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Proceedings, pp. 779–783 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364726.

  40. Yang Z, Li G, He H and Li G (2017) Study on road feeling simulation control algorithm for four-wheel independent drive and steering electric vehicle’, Proceedings - 2017 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2017, vol. 2017-January, pp. 4872–4875 https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2017.8243641.

  41. Wang Y, Chen N, Tian J and Xu X (2014) Handing performances of vehicle with a fractional compliant rear-wheel steering system. 2014 International Conference on Fractional Differentiation and Its Applications, ICFDA 2014 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFDA.2014.6967444.

  42. ‘Drives. Differential Drive | by Ruthu S Sanketh | MANUAL ROBOTICS | Medium. Available: https://medium.com/manual-robotics/drives-76c2b2dac97c. Accessed: 20 Oct 2023

  43. Velázquez R and Lay-Ekuakille A (2011) A review of models and structures for wheeled mobile robots: four case studies’, IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Robotics: New Boundaries for Robotics, ICAR 2011, pp. 524–529 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAR.2011.6088568.

  44. Caracciolo L, De Luca A and Iannitti S (1999) Trajectory tracking control of a four-wheel differentially driven mobile robot. Proceedings 1999 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (Cat. No. 99CH36288C), Vol. 4. IEEE, pp. 2632–2638. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/773994

  45. Siradjuddin I, Azhar G, Wibowo S, Ronilaya F, Rahmad C, Erfan R (2022) A general inverse kinematic formulation and control schemes for omnidirectional robots. Eng Lett 29:1

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kanjanawanishkul K (2015) Omnidirectional wheeled mobile robots: wheel types and practical applications. Int J Adv Mechatron Syst 6(6):289–302. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAMECHS.2015.074788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Song J, Byun K (2004) Design and control of a four-wheeled omnidirectional mobile robot with steerable omnidirectional wheels. J Robot Syst 21(4):193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Holland J (2003) Designing autonomous mobile robots: inside the mind of an intelligent machine. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7683-0.X5000-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu CW, Hwang CK (2009) Omni-wheel based drive mechanism

    Google Scholar 

  50. Islam ZU, Chiddarwar SS and Sahoo SR (2022) Design of robust backstepping controller for four-wheeled mecanum mobile robot’, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 1125–1134 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0550-5_107/COVER.

  51. Zeidis I, Zimmermann K (2019) Dynamics of a four-wheeled mobile robot with Mecanum wheels. ZAMM – J Appl Math Mech Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 99(12):e201900173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ZAMM.201900173

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Brown N, Pierce T, McCusker J, Ma G and Cuckov F (2023) Development of kinematic and dynamic model of an omnidirectional four mecanum wheeled robot’, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), vol. 5 https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2022-96143.

  53. B. Gray, “Roboting: a guide for total noobs a guide for total noobs,” CD-Media, 2018. Available: https://www.chiefdelphi.com/uploads/default/original/3X/d/d/dd93a8c1a19639feb94431e4b900adb564f65843.pdf. . Accessed: . 19 Jul 2024

  54. Merry RJE (2003) Experimental modal analysis of the H-drive. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 078:2003

    Google Scholar 

  55. ‘Team 6635 H-Bot prototype chassis | 3D CAD model library | GrabCAD. Available: https://grabcad.com/library/team-6635-h-bot-prototype-chassis-1. Accessed: 20 Oct 2023

  56. Oftadeh R, Aref MM, Ghabcheloo R, Mattila J (2013) Mechatronic design of a four wheel steering mobile robot with fault-tolerant odometry feedback. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46(5):663–669. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130410-3-CN-2034.00092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. ‘SDS MK4 Swerve Modules - AndyMark, Inc. Available: https://www.andymark.com/products/mk4-swerve-modules. Accessed: 23 Jun 2023

  58. ‘Swerve Central - DEW Robotics. Available: http://team1640.com/wiki/index.php/Swerve_Central’. Accessed: 31 Mar 2023

  59. Das SK, Pasan MK (2016) Design and methodology of automated guided vehicle-a review. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE). pp 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  60. Søraa RA, Fostervold ME (2021) Social domestication of service robots: the secret lives of Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) at a Norwegian hospital. Int J Hum Comput Stud 152:102627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhangfang Hu, Wang X, Zhang J (2023) Research on dynamic obstacle avoidance method of mobile robot based on improved A* algorithm and dynamic window method. Eng Lett 23(3):520–530

    Google Scholar 

  62. Alatise MB, Hancke GP (2020) A review on challenges of autonomous mobile robot and sensor fusion methods. IEEE Access 8:39830–39846. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Haider I, Khan KB, Haider MA (2020) A. Saeed, and K. Nisar, ‘Automated robotic system for assistance of isolated patients of coronavirus (COVID-19)’, in 2020 IEEE 23rd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC50486.2020.9318124.

  64. ‘Lamson Concepts – Hospital logistics robots - Robotics Pathways. Available: http://55construction.com/robotics2/lamson/. Accessed: 23 Jun 2023

  65. Lee K, Lee C-H, Hwang S, Choi J, Bang Y (2016) Power-assisted wheelchair with gravity and friction compensation. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 63(4):2203–2211. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2514357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. ‘Power Wheelchairs | Power Chairs | SpinLife. Available: https://www.spinlife.com/category.cfm?categoryID=3’. Accessed: 23 Jun 2023

  67. Baltazar AR, Petry MR, Silva MF, Moreira AP (2021) Autonomous wheelchair for patient’s transportation on healthcare institutions. SN Appl Sci 3(3):354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04304-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang C, Savkin AV, Clout R, Nguyen HT (2015) An intelligent robotic hospital bed for safe transportation of critical neurosurgery patients along crowded hospital corridors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 23(5):744–754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2347377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wang C, Matveev AS, Savkin AV, Clout R, Nguyen HT (2016) A semi-autonomous motorized mobile hospital bed for safe transportation of head injury patients in dynamic hospital environments without bed switching. Robotica 34(8):1880–1897. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574714002641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Girindra FG, Budiono HDS, Dhelika R (2023) Evaluation of assembly time of motorized wheel module for hospital bed using Boothroyd-Dewhurst method. J Adv Res Appl Mech 108(1):27–46. https://doi.org/10.37934/ARAM.108.1.2746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. ‘ZEDTM-Zero Effort Driving® The new omni-directional bed mover. Available: www.materialshandling.com.au’, Accessed: 23 Jun 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This research is funded by Hibah PUTI Universitas Indonesia 2023–2024 (Contract no: NKB-829/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ANR was mainly in charge of the analysis and writing of the manuscript. BH contributed to the analysis and writing the manuscript. RD contributed to analysis and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radon Dhelika.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabbani, A.N., Hadisujoto, B. & Dhelika, R. Motorized hospital bed for mobility of patients: a review on wheel type design. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 71, 170 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00504-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00504-9

Keywords