From: A comprehensive review on thermal management of electronic devices
Ref. | Heat sources | Findings | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
Shankar et al. [61] | 3 × 5 aluminum HSs | The numerical results demonstrated a drop in Reynolds number and HSs surface temperature, as well as an increase in thermal conductivity. | Because the current study solely takes into account that specific arrangement, there were few applications offered. |
Shankar et al. [62] | 9 aluminum square parts | The results showed that the temperature excess values achieved for FR4 and bakelite were high when compared to the copper-clad board. | Correlations were not very useful. |
Kia et al. [63] | 15 protruding aluminum square HSs | The single-side copper clad was selected, according to experiment results, and simulations showed a variation of less than 5%. | High-temperature applications are constrained. |
Naveen et al. [64] | 15 aluminum discrete square HSs of 15,155Â mm sizes | An analysis revealed that a single-layer copper-clad substrate board could effectively dissipate heat from electronic components for the heat flux values (4000 to 12,000 W/m2) | The single-layer copper-clad board was an inappropriate selection for the substrate board. |