Table 5 Comparison of target identification between the algorithm of this paper and the center-of-centroid method
Algorithm of this paper (m) | the center-of-centroid method | Difference value (mm) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Feature | \(x\)(m) | \(y\)(m) | \(z\)(m) | \(x\)(m) | \(y\)(m) | \(z\)(m) | \(\Delta x\) | \(\Delta y\) | \(\Delta z\) |
1 | Full | − 2.1633 | 46.6642 | − 0.2360 | − 2.1629 | 46.6638 | − 0.2365 | − 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Defects1/3 | − 2.1633 | 46.6642 | − 0.2361 | − 2.1651 | 46.6653 | − 0.2282 | 1.8 | − 1.0 | − 7.8 | |
Defects2/3 | − 2.1632 | 46.6643 | − 0.2359 | − 2.1685 | 46.6651 | − 0.2214 | 5.3 | − 0.7 | − 14.5 | |
Cover 1/3 | − 2.1629 | 46.6634 | − 0.2360 | − 2.1494 | 46.6840 | − 0.2181 | − 13.5 | − 20.6 | − 17.9 | |
Cover 2/3 | − 2.1630 | 46.6626 | − 0.2367 | − 2.1519 | 46.6981 | − 0.1806 | − 11.2 | − 35.5 | − 56.1 | |
2 | Full | − 22.0447 | 55.1666 | 2.3041 | − 22.0443 | 55.1660 | 2.3043 | − 0.4 | 0.6 | − 0.3 |
3 | Full | − 24.0349 | 27.4989 | − 0.2163 | − 24.0347 | 27.4985 | − 0.2167 | − 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 |