Table 3 SWOT evaluation of the paradigm for HIA
Strengths | Weakness |
|---|---|
Long-term advancements in evaluations | Adds a new dimension to the assessment and expense; |
Enhanced OUV characteristic mitigation | No immediate enhancements in OUV characteristic mitigation |
Improved comprehension of significant risks to and determinants of OUV characteristics | Inadequate investigative avenues |
Recognizes and takes into account both technical and thematic efficacy | Inability to conduct performance assessments |
Improved understanding of the structural components and contradictions | A brief amount of duration |
Enhanced clarity regarding the authenticity degree of OUV features; | It might not be suited to scenarios when there is no modification |
Enhances the legitimacy of subjective judgments | Effectiveness assessments obtain the inability to capitalize on information and expertise |
Opportunities | Threat |
Enhanced communication among various entities in cultural heritage | Absence of electoral backing from interested parties |
Improved comprehension of significant challenges to OUV qualities | Additional economic needs are now impacting expenditures for historical maintenance and safeguarding |
Creation of instruction that is more precise and lucid | Absence of agreement on crucial efficacy factors |
HIA efficacy is the subject of new study topics | A shortage of funds |
The possibility of creating a standardized effect presents for specific modification drivers | Misused visibility to undermine OUV characteristics |
Continuous monitoring of universal objectives and operational procedures based on efficiency evaluation expertise | Implementation of a reactionary instead of proactive preservation strategy in the occurrence of paradigm misunderstanding |