Skip to main content

Table 12 Results of benchmark models along with proposed one

From: Ensemble of deep learning and machine learning approach for classification of handwritten Hindi numerals

Sl. no

Benchmark model

Feature-types

Classifier

Dataset size

Test-sample count

Feature-vector size

Max. recg. acc. (%) for Hindi numerals

1

Khanduja et al. [3]a

Hybrid of structural and statistical features (intersection points, end points, loops, and pixel distributions)

MLP

22,556

2000

462

95.5

2

Trivedi et al. [9]

Image

CNN with genetic algorithm and L-BFGS method

22,546

3762

256

96.54

3

Kumar et al. [10]b

Image

Convolution autoencoder

17,000

3400

1032

99.59

4

Singh et al. [4]

Regional-weighted run length

MLP, NB, logistic, RF, SVM

6000

2000

196

95.02 with SVM

5

Chaurasiya et al. [11]b

CNN-based features

SVM

22,556

3759

1600

99.41

6

Sarkhel et al. [12]b

CNN-based features

SVM

3000

1000

4096, 2560, & 1792

99.5

7

Proposed model

Fusion-based features as received from VGG-16Net, VGG-19Net, ResNet-50, and Inception-v3

SVM

20,000

5000

80

99.72

  1. aThe benchmark model in [3] addressed the recognition problem of handwritten Devanagari characters and numerals individually. Recognition accuracy for numerals was included in the table to maintain relevance to the proposed study
  2. bBenchmark models in [10,11,12] addressed the recognition problem of handwritten numerals related to various other scripts as well. Recognition accuracy for Devanagari numerals was included in the table to maintain relevance to the proposed study