Journal of Engineering and Applied Science

Table 16 Max. deflection values for different analysis methods

From: Effect of alternative load path design method on preventing progressive collapse and reducing the rehabilitation cost using FEMA-P58

Analysis Method	No. of Floors	Max. Deflection Value (m)
		Case (A)			Case (B)
		Int	Ext	Cor	Int	Ext	Cor
Static-N.L	6^th	0.01624	0.0155	0.0159	0.0117	0.0103	0.01155
	9^th	0.01724	0.0176	0.0176	0.01289	0.01375	0.01364
	12^th	0.01922	0.02075	0.02075	0.01475	0.01683	0.01628
	15^th	0.01941	0.02249	0.0226	0.01541	0.01824	0.01826
Dynamic-N.L	6^th	0.00800	0.00632	0.00647	0.0052	0.00427	0.00465
	9^th	0.00803	0.00745	0.00721	0.00573	0.00543	0.0056
	12^th	0.00899	0.00903	0.00827	0.00662	0.00705	0.00664
	15^th	0.00928	0.01006	0.00936	0.00718	0.00796	0.00757
Dynamic-F.N.A	6^th	0.00609	0.00462	0.00402	0.00394	0.00333	0.00218
	9^th	0.00621	0.00536	0.00524	0.00409	0.00383	0.00387
	12^th	0.00683	0.00638	0.00564	0.00476	0.00456	0.00461
	15^th	0.00720	0.00668	0.00647	0.00495	0.00469	0.00502

Back to article page