Table 3 Comparison table shows the difference in BET
From: Utilization of solid materials to remove ammonia from drinking water
No | Adsorbent | S. area, m2/g | Max. removal % | Pore radius, nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sugarcane peels | 981.213 | 58 | 1.3897 |
2 | Activated diatom | 826.374 | 9 | 1.6501 |
3 | Activated carbon | 343.742 | 49 | 3.967 |
4 | Activated zeolite | 225.478 | 20 | 6.0478 |
5 | Rice straw | 184.669 | 17 | 7.3842 |
6 | White foam | 157.669 | 24 | 8.6487 |
7 | Ilmenite | 65.5909 | 62 | 20.79 |
8 | Redbrick | 9.38497 | 0 | 145.3 |
9 | Ilmenite and sugarcane | ----- | 22 | ----- |