Table 6 The suggested optimal solution set
From: Multi-objective optimization of heat sink with multi-cross-ribbed-fins for a motor controller
Design | Nf | Nc | h(mm) | ΔTsub(%) | msub(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original design | 28 | - | - | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Optimal 1# (design B#) | 18 | 3 | 2.50 | 7.63 | 0.67 |
Optimal 2# | 18 | 3 | 2.22 | 6.48 | 2.29 |
Optimal 3# | 18 | 3 | 2.13 | 5.60 | 3.38 |
Optimal 4# | 19 | 2 | 2.41 | 4.87 | 4.59 |
Optimal 5# | 19 | 2 | 2.28 | 4.20 | 5.13 |
Optimal 6# (design C#) | 19 | 2 | 2.22 | 3.70 | 5.53 |
Optimal 7# | 18 | 2 | 2.50 | 3.70 | 6.61 |
Optimal 8# | 18 | 2 | 2.44 | 3.16 | 7.15 |
Optimal 9# | 18 | 2 | 2.32 | 2.20 | 7.56 |
Optimal 10# | 18 | 2 | 2.23 | 1.45 | 7.83 |
Optimal 11# | 17 | 2 | 2.50 | 1.39 | 8.77 |
Optimal 12# | 17 | 2 | 2.45 | 0.75 | 9.31 |
Optimal 13# (design D#) | 17 | 2 | 2.43 | 0.48 | 9.45 |