Skip to main content

Table 4 Computed and simulated performance indicators for existing furrow irrigation practices

From: Performance evaluation of furrow irrigation water management practice under Wonji Shoa Sugar Estate condition, in Central Ethiopia

IEs FL (m) Q(l/s) Tco (min) AE (%) DU (%) DP (%)
Comp. Sim. Comp. Sim. Comp. Sim.
1 32 4.7 9 48.4 43.2 85.8 83.2 51.6 56.8
48 4.7 15 52.0 43.7 79.3 73.0 48.0 56.3
64 4.7 25 58.0 55.5 90.5 70.0 55.0 44.0
2 32 4.7 9 44.2 46.6 87.2 80.6 55.8 53.4
48 4.7 15 49.7 48.0 82.7 64.7 50.3 52.0
64 4.7 25 49.0 49.0 91.0 62.5 51.0 51.0
3 32 4.7 10 46.0 53.2 89.0 77.2 54.0 46.8
48 4.7 15 54.0 53.7 81.7 67.7 46.0 46.3
64 4.7 25 41.5 41.5 88.0 69.5 58.5 58.5
  1. Comp. computed, Sim. simulated, AE application efficiency, DU distribution uniformity, DP deep percolation