Table 4 Computed and simulated performance indicators for existing furrow irrigation practices
IEs | FL (m) | Q(l/s) | Tco (min) | AE (%) | DU (%) | DP (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comp. | Sim. | Comp. | Sim. | Comp. | Sim. | ||||
1 | 32 | 4.7 | 9 | 48.4 | 43.2 | 85.8 | 83.2 | 51.6 | 56.8 |
48 | 4.7 | 15 | 52.0 | 43.7 | 79.3 | 73.0 | 48.0 | 56.3 | |
64 | 4.7 | 25 | 58.0 | 55.5 | 90.5 | 70.0 | 55.0 | 44.0 | |
2 | 32 | 4.7 | 9 | 44.2 | 46.6 | 87.2 | 80.6 | 55.8 | 53.4 |
48 | 4.7 | 15 | 49.7 | 48.0 | 82.7 | 64.7 | 50.3 | 52.0 | |
64 | 4.7 | 25 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 91.0 | 62.5 | 51.0 | 51.0 | |
3 | 32 | 4.7 | 10 | 46.0 | 53.2 | 89.0 | 77.2 | 54.0 | 46.8 |
48 | 4.7 | 15 | 54.0 | 53.7 | 81.7 | 67.7 | 46.0 | 46.3 | |
64 | 4.7 | 25 | 41.5 | 41.5 | 88.0 | 69.5 | 58.5 | 58.5 | |