Performance evaluation of furrow irrigation water management practice under Wonji Shoa Sugar Estate condition, in Central Ethiopia

Journal of Engineering and Applied Science

Table 2 Analysis of selected soil parameters for the selected fields

Field no.	Furrow length	P_d (g/cm³)		Soil texture	FC (%)		PWP (%)		MC (%)
Field no.	Furrow length	0–30	30–60	Soil texture	0–30	30–60	0–30	30–60	0–30	30–60
15	32 m	1.53	1.64	Clay	48.50	51.90	21.60	22.4.	40.29	41.82
42		1.55	1.64	Silt	49.10	49.70	28.60	27.20	41.18	42.87
80		1.54	1.62	Silt	48.50	51.90	21.60	22.40	41.15	42.12
102		1.51	1.60	Silt	49.10	49.70	28.60	27.20	40.03	41.09
279		1.55	1.66	Clay	49.10	49.70	28.60	27.20	40.72	44.25
15	48 m	1.60	1.70	Clay	48.50	51.90	21.60	22.40	42.77	43.30
16		1.50	1.62	Clay	50.50	54.90	24.20	24.40	44.30	45.02
80		1.55	1.60	Silt	48.50	51.90	22.40	21.73	40.59	43.93
15	64 m	1.50	1.59	Clay	48.88	51.16	21.98	22.28	40.41	42.59
264	64 m	1.49	1.61	Silt	48.88	51.16	21.98	22.28	41.36	42.68

P_d bulk density, FC soil moisture content at field capacity, PWP moisture content at the permanent wilting point, MC present soil moisture content, D_app = depth of application