Skip to main content

Table 4 Pairwise comparison matrix for subcriteria

From: GIS and remote sensing coupled with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the selection of appropriate sites for landfills: a case study in the province of Ouarzazate, Morocco

Criteria

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C1

1.00

1.00

4.00

4.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

0.50

0.50

3.00

5.00

C2

1.00

1.00

4.00

4.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

0.50

0.50

3.00

5.00

C3

0.25

0.25

1.00

1.00

0.33

0.33

0.33

0.20

0.20

0.50

2.00

C4

0.25

0.25

1.00

1.00

0.33

0.33

0.33

0.20

0.20

0.50

2.00

C5

0.50

0.50

3.00

3.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.33

0.33

2.00

4.00

C6

0.50

0.50

3.00

3.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.33

0.33

2.00

4.00

C7

0.50

0.50

3.00

3.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.33

0.33

2.00

4.00

C8

2.00

2.00

5.00

5.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

1.00

1.00

4.00

6.00

C9

2.00

2.00

5.00

5.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

1.00

1.00

4.00

6.00

C10

0.33

0.33

2.00

2.00

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

1.00

3.00

C11

0.20

0.20

0.50

0.50

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.17

0.17

0.33

1.00

Total

8.53

8.53

31.50

31.50

14.42

14.42

14.42

4.82

4.82

22.33

42.00

  1. Number of comparisons = 55, principal eigen value = 11,1996, eigenvector solution: 4 iterations, delta = 3, E−8