Table 5 Model Parameters Estimation
From: Studying driving behavior and risk perception: a road safety perspective in Egypt
Parameter | β | Std. Error | 95% Wald Confidence Interval | Hypothesis Test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | Wald Chi-Sq. | D.F. | Sig. | ||||
A: Demographics Model | (Intercept) | 1.107 | 0.1224 | 0.867 | 1.347 | 81.794 | 1 | *** .000 |
Age | −0.159 | 0.0418 | −0.241 | −0.077 | 14.449 | 1 | *** .000 | |
# of Daily Trips | 0.067 | 0.0217 | 0.025 | 0.110 | 9.578 | 1 | *** .002 | |
# of Daily Driving Hours | 0.068 | 0.0235 | 0.021 | 0.114 | 8.224 | 1 | *** .004 | |
Omnibus Test < Like hood Ratio Chi-Square = 45.081 @ D.F = 3 & P = 0.000 > Goodness Of Fit < Deviance (726.146) / Degree of Freedom (819) = 0.887, Pearson Chi-Square (1011.291) / Degree of Freedom (819) = 1.235, AIC = 3430.093, BIC = 3453.663, CAIC = 3458.663> | ||||||||
B: Driver Behavior Model | (Intercept) | .867 | .1505 | .572 | 1.162 | 33.198 | 1 | *** .000 |
Exceeding Speed Limit | .057 | .0276 | .003 | .111 | 4.251 | 1 | * .039 | |
Honking Horn / Using High Beam | .093 | .0237 | .047 | .139 | 15.431 | 1 | *** .000 | |
Driving in Opposite Direction | .085 | .0344 | .018 | .153 | 6.173 | 1 | * .013 | |
Keeping Safe Following Distance | −.077 | .0240 | −.124 | −.030 | 10.417 | 1 | ** .001 | |
Using Seatbelt While Driving | −.059 | .0199 | −.098 | −.020 | 8.843 | 1 | ** .003 | |
Omnibus Test < Like hood Ratio Chi-Square = 67.584 @ Degree of Freedom = 5 & P = 0.000.> Goodness Of Fit < Deviance (724.811)/ Degree of Freedom (817) = 0.887, Pearson Chi-Square(972.366) / Degree of Freedom (817) = 1.190, AIC = 3422.174, BIC = 3455.174, CAIC = 3462.174> | ||||||||
C: Demographics and Driver Behavior Combined Model | (Intercept) | .563 | .2013 | .168 | .957 | 7.821 | 1 | ** .005 |
Age | −.118 | .0474 | −.211 | −.025 | 6.220 | 1 | * .013 | |
Driving Experience | .004 | .0245 | −.044 | .052 | .030 | 1 | .862 | |
# of Daily Driving Hours | .065 | .0249 | .016 | .113 | 6.748 | 1 | ** .009 | |
Transportation Type | −.025 | .0135 | −.052 | .001 | 3.526 | 1 | .060 | |
# of Daily Trips | .060 | .0210 | .019 | .101 | 8.069 | 1 | ** .005 | |
Who Accompanies in Your Trips | −.011 | .0209 | −.052 | .030 | .258 | 1 | .612 | |
Exceeding Speed Limit | .027 | .0312 | −.034 | .088 | .742 | 1 | .389 | |
Overtaking Illegally | .001 | .0288 | −.055 | .058 | .002 | 1 | .965 | |
Mobile Phone Use | −.058 | .0273 | −.112 | −.005 | 4.532 | 1 | .033 | |
Honking Horn / Using High Beam | .106 | .0251 | .057 | .155 | 17.825 | 1 | *** .000 | |
Tailgating | −.008 | .0244 | −.056 | .040 | .099 | 1 | .752 | |
Miss Exits | −.035 | .0341 | −.101 | .032 | 1.028 | 1 | .311 | |
Driving in Opposite Direction | .113 | .0347 | .045 | .181 | 10.594 | 1 | ** .001 | |
Running Red lights | .035 | .0250 | −.014 | .084 | 1.922 | 1 | .166 | |
Lane change | .037 | .0325 | −.027 | .100 | 1.265 | 1 | .261 | |
Omnibus Test < Like hood Ratio Chi-Square = 105.686 @ D.F = 15 & P = 0.000 > Goodness Of Fit < Deviance (718.097) / Degree of Freedom (807) = 0.890, Pearson Chi-Square (974.907) / Degree of Freedom (807) = 1.208, AIC = 3404.072, BIC = 3484.213, CAIC = 3501.213> | ||||||||
D: Adjusted Demographics and Driver Behavior Combined Model | (Intercept) | .685 | .1608 | .370 | 1.000 | 18.131 | 1 | *** .000 |
Honking Horn / Using High Beam | .096 | .0233 | .050 | .141 | 16.872 | 1 | *** .000 | |
Driving in Opposite Direction | .106 | .0329 | .042 | .171 | 10.451 | 1 | ** .001 | |
Keeping Safe Following Distance | −.066 | .0237 | −.113 | −.020 | 7.856 | ** .005 | ||
Age | −.116 | .0377 | −.190 | −.042 | 9.460 | 1 | ** .002 | |
# of Daily Trips | .075 | .0192 | .037 | .112 | 15.078 | 1 | *** .000 | |
# of Daily Driving Hours | .045 | .0212 | .003 | .086 | 4.422 | * .035 | ||
Omnibus Test < Like hood Ratio Chi-Square = 99.235 @ D.F = 6 & P = 0.000 > Goodness Of Fit < Deviance (720.037) / Degree of Freedom (816) = 0.912, Pearson Chi-Square (976.801) / Degree of Freedom (816) = 1.097, AIC = 3392.524, BIC = 3430.237, CAIC = 3438.237 > | ||||||||