Table 2 Example of a “CMME evaluation” table for the assessment of a CASE mobility application involving traffic-free zones in the CBD of the city of Thessaloniki (a similar table was constructed for the alternative CASE mobility application involving intelligent traffic control)
From: Assessing the impact of case mobility: issues and recommendations from Greece
Potential impact or evaluation criteria | CASE mobility application elements (for both applications): | Row totals (sum of scores × weights) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intelligent—traffic control | Travel info | Dynamic route guidance | Road user charging | e-surveillance | Freight deliveries mgmt. | |||||||||
1 | Improved safety levels | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 44 |
2 | Reduced CO2 emissions | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 75 |
3 | Access to PT services | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | 1 | - | 1 | 25 |
4 | Reduced congestion | 9 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 114 |
5 | Smooth and seamless journeys | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 50 |
6 | City liveability | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 72 |
Column totals (left: sum of rows 1–6/right: sum of the products: scores × weights, rows 1–6) | 33 | 76 | 23 | 46 | 34 | 79 | 28 | 79 | 21 | 46 | 20 | 54 | 380 | |